Thursday, March 6, 2014

Killing “Job-Killing” Environmental Regulations Can Kill You

One of the dumbest policies imaginable is that government environmental regulation is an unnecessary luxury that stifles business growth and kills job opportunities. Tell that to the denizens of Beijing who know that their city has a skyline, but they not only cannot see it, they are dying from breathing the toxic air that blocks their view. I guess it is better to have a job than to be healthy. You may not live that long, and your children may be described as “sickly,” but at least you are working and there are corporate shareholders with smiles on their faces.
There was a time when North Carolina was proud of its Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) and the enforcement efforts that kept natural waterways clean and air very breathable. But there was a new storm surge in 2011, when Tea Party-inspired GOP officials took over the legislature and installed a brand, spanking new conservative governor. This right wing surge campaigned heavily on cutting “job-killing” regulation, particularly rules that were environmentally focused. What’s more, Gov. Pat McCrory (former Charlotte mayor) spent 28 years working for Duke Energy, a power company with a checkered track record of environmental compliance.
The new patois in the State Capitol in Raleigh turned the DENR into a customer service wing of government, and the new customers were… big business seeking permits for whatever businesses activities they wanted to build or expand. Not all of the citizens of North Carolina, just business. DENR civil servants were told that their mandate was to expedite and minimize the restrictions from the permitting process. Their job was focused now on getting out of the way and to stop looking at possible environmental consequences to business expansion. DENR regulators apparently didn’t believe the message.
“‘The General Assembly doesn’t like you,’ an official in the Department of Environment and Natural Resources told supervisors called to a drab meeting room here. ‘They cut your budget, but you didn’t get the message. And they cut your budget again, and you still didn’t get the message.’… From now on, regulators were told, they must focus on customer service, meaning issuing environmental permits for businesses as quickly as possible. Big changes are coming, the official said, according to three people in the meeting, two of whom took notes. ‘If you don’t like change, you’ll be gone.’…
“Last year, the environment agency’s budget for water pollution programs was cut by 10.2 percent, a bipartisan commission that approves regulations was reorganized to include only Republican appointees, and the governor vastly expanded the number of agency employees exempt from civil service protections, to 179 from 24.
“The effect, said midlevel supervisors who now serve at the pleasure of the governor, is that they are hesitant to crack down on polluters who might complain to [McCrory-appointee, state environmental secretary, John E. Skvarla III] or a lawmaker, at the risk of their jobs. Several spoke anonymously out of fear of being fired.” New York Times, February 28th.
Enter Duke Energy, and the matter of their big spill – 39,000 tons of toxic coal ash (the third largest such spill in history) – into North Carolina’s Dan River in early February. “The spill, which coated the river bottom 70 miles downstream and threatened drinking water and aquatic life, drew attention to a deal that the environmental department’s new leadership reached with Duke last year over pollution from coal ash ponds. It included a minimal fine but no order that Duke remove the ash — the waste from burning coal to generate electricity — from its leaky, unlined ponds. Environmental groups said the arrangement protected a powerful utility rather than the environment or the public…
“Federal prosecutors have begun a criminal investigation into the spill and the relations between Duke and regulators at the environmental agency.” NY Times. You mean that same Duke Energy where the Governor had been employed almost three decades? But didn’t the voters actually sanctify this level of corruption in the 2011 election? Didn’t they actually demand this result?
One of the most obvious realities in a world of competitive edge: no business can increase their production costs to implement environmental protections when their competitors are not equally forced to do the same. Environmental regulation can, therefore, almost never be a matter of voluntary compliance unless every competitor is saddled with an equal burden. No corporate executive can survive by making his company less competitive. And for those who believe that environment regulations are stupid, let’s let their children breathe that polluted air and drink toxic water and see how they feel about it. Who cares? You should!
I’m Peter Dekom, and breathing clean air and drinking potable water seem to be pretty sacred resources that we all need to respect and cherish.

No comments: