Conspiracy
theorists point lovingly to viral social media and “factual” websites to
support their rather obviously distorted view of what is happening in the
world. It is this propensity to believe “what is written,” what is
retransmitted as the gospel often received from fellow conspiracy theorists, that
continues to empower the Russian apparat of digital disinformation used to
destabilize democratic elections the world over and to discredit Western
leaders who criticize mother Russia. The hyper-accelerant of polarization and
discontent, fueling the undercutting of democratic institutions unprepared to
defend against such onslaughts under the protection of free speech. The very
liberalism of communication that lies at the heart of democracy is precisely its
Achilles Heel.
With
little or nothing being done by the Trump administration to stem this Russian
tidal wave of destabilization – apparently to avoid admitting that the Russian
effort was directed at supporting Trump and denigrating Clinton – the Russians
are only accelerating their highly effective hacking the disinformation
machine. The President is content to ignore the research and investigative
results from his own intelligence agencies… and even his most recent political
appointees… on point.
“Senior
Trump administration officials warned Congress on Tuesday [5/22] of ongoing
efforts by Russia to interfere in the 2018 midterm congressional elections as
the federal government prepares to hand out $380 million in election security
funding to states.
“At
a briefing attended by about 40 or 50 members of the 435-member U.S. House of
Representatives, the heads of FBI, Homeland Security Department and the
director of National Intelligence told members to urge states and cities
overseeing elections to be prepared for threats….DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen
[a most recent Trump appointee] told reporters she agreed Russia was trying to
influence the 2018 elections.” Reuters, May 22nd.
But
if you think you’ve witnessed highly effective digital misdirection to date,
think again. As artificial intelligence and technology improve, you ain’t seen
nuffin’ yet. Audio-visual manipulation can now create seamless videos
accompanied with voices that seem to be completely real… but they are creative
visions that never happened, total fabrications.
Franklin
Foer, writing for the May 18th issue of The Atlantic, provides a
coarse example of this new technological phenomenon: “In
a dank corner of the internet, it is possible to find actresses from Game
of Thrones or Harry Potter engaged in all manner of
sex acts. Or at least to the world the carnal figures look like those
actresses, and the faces in the videos are indeed their own. Everything south
of the neck, however, belongs to different women. An artificial intelligence
has almost seamlessly stitched the familiar visages into pornographic scenes,
one face swapped for another. The genre is one of the cruelest, most invasive
forms of identity theft invented in the internet era. At the core of the
cruelty is the acuity of the technology: A casual observer can’t easily detect
the hoax.
“This development, which has been the subject of much
hand-wringing in the tech press, is the work of a programmer who goes by the
nom de hack ‘deepfakes.’ And it is merely a beta version of a much more
ambitious project. One of deepfakes’s compatriots told Vice’s
Motherboard site in January that he intends to democratize this work. He wants
to refine the process, further automating it, which would allow anyone to
transpose the disembodied head of a crush or an ex or a co-worker into an
extant pornographic clip with just a few simple steps. No technical knowledge
would be required. And because academic and commercial labs are developing even
more-sophisticated tools for non-pornographic purposes—algorithms that map
facial expressions and mimic voices with precision—the sordid fakes will soon
acquire even greater verisimilitude.
“The internet has always contained
the seeds of postmodern hell. Mass manipulation, from clickbait to Russian bots
to the addictive trickery that governs Facebook’s News Feed, is the currency of
the medium. It has always been a place where identity is terrifyingly slippery,
where anonymity breeds coarseness and confusion, where crooks can filch the
very contours of selfhood. In this respect, the rise of deepfakes is the
culmination of the internet’s history to date—and probably only a low-grade
version of what’s to come.”
If this is the “low grade” version of our digital future, and
technology is accelerating, what exactly can you expect when over-funded,
exceptionally technically-advanced software experts – such as the ones produced
in Russia by the tens of thousands every year – decide to perfect this
substitute-for-reality audio-visual manufacturing? Add artificial intelligence
to the mix, and the expected horrors are obvious: you can pretty much get any
person who has ever been recorded on video very convincingly to be depicted as
saying and doing just about anything the audio-visual technologist wants them
to say or do. Conspiracy theorists delight! Anything you can dream of will,
sooner rather than later, be able to be constructed in a believable manner to
support even the wildest and obviously false conspiracy theories imaginable.
But
there is a side-effect to all this visual falsehood: the ability to challenge
the veracity of audio-visual material that is not fake! Foer continues: “That
all takes us to the nub of the problem. It’s natural to trust one’s own senses,
to believe what one sees—a hardwired tendency that the coming age of
manipulated video will exploit. Consider recent flash points in what the
University of Michigan’s Aviv Ovadya calls the ‘infopocalypse’—and imagine just
how much worse they would have been with manipulated video. Take Pizzagate
[according to Salon.com, 12/10/16 – “‘Pizzagate’
[was a fake] conspiracy theory that's escalated to the point that an armed man
actually drove up the East Coast to
‘self-investigate’ whether a D.C. pizza restaurant had a secret pedophilia dungeon in its
basement, ending with him shooting his assault rifle inside the restaurant and
being arrested”], and then add concocted footage of John Podesta leering
at a child, or worse. Falsehoods will suddenly acquire a whole new, explosive
emotional intensity.
“But
the problem isn’t just the proliferation of falsehoods. Fabricated videos will
create new and understandable suspicions about everything we watch. Politicians
and publicists will exploit those doubts. When captured in a moment of
wrongdoing, a culprit will simply declare the visual evidence a malicious
concoction. The president, reportedly, has already pioneered this tactic: Even
though he initially conceded the authenticity of the Access Hollywood video,
he now privately casts doubt on whether the voice on the tape is his own.
“In other words, manipulated video will ultimately destroy
faith in our strongest remaining tether to the idea of common reality. As Ian
Goodfellow, a scientist at Google, told MIT Technology Review,
‘It’s been a little bit of a fluke, historically, that we’re able to rely on
videos as evidence that something really happened.’” The real challenge will be
how a First-Amendment-Protected-American-Democracy can effectively negate the
democracy-destroying impact of speech and press reports that are depicted as
real but are total fabrications. It gets worse when such offenses are so
numerous as to defy tracking, verification and control.
I’m Peter Dekom, and
given that we have a President who is rather completely reliant on his own
dissemination of false information, it is difficult to see how our government
can take meaningful steps to stop such conduct by others.
No comments:
Post a Comment