We
all know that the work world is being jarred by the acceleration of automation
and artificial intelligence. Add in the variables that the current
administration is deporting a large segment of our lower-end labor force for
the kinds of work Americans will not take at any wage rate and denying visas to
a vast coterie of in-demand high-skillset-educated technically-adept workers.
Technology responds to that job vacuum, as it did with oil workers when the
price of oil plunged, by designing new machines – imbued with artificial
intelligence – such as new agricultural equipment to plant and harvest crops
with perfect timing and waste avoidance (one example pictured above).
But
certain heavy work, manual labor, does not go away, particularly in
construction. Most of the agricultural world cannot yet afford those expensive
replacement machines… but those prices will come down. Looking at the
expectations of the near-term labor demands in representative Western markets
(including the United States), mega-consulting firm McKinsey (their Global
Institute) released a paper analyzing the job market demand factors for the 2030
work force.
Summarized
in the May 25th FastCompany.com, the McKinsey report observed: Here’s
what demand will look like by 2030:
- Demand for technological skills, both basic digital and advanced tech, will rise by 55%
- Demand for social and emotional skills, such as leadership and managing others, will rise by 24%
- Demand for basic cognitive skills, which include basic data input and processing, will decline by 15%
- Demand for physical and manual skills, which include general equipment operation, will decline by 14%
Eric
Hazan, a senior partner at McKinsey & Company in Paris and a coauthor of
the report, warned that the skill shift could cause further exacerbate income
inequality and a divide between companies that can and can’t attract top
talent. ‘The watchword of the new era will be adaptability,’ he said in a
statement. ‘Workers but also companies will need to be open and embrace new
forms of working, new structures, and new approaches, in a world of work that
will be changing rapidly.’
What is particularly interesting is the
mismatch between what U.S. colleges and universities are able to produce even
today in terms of the most-sought-after educational skills and the obvious
demand for such skills. Not enough! Our population has been growing for the
last two decades, not from normal reproductive replacement (the United States
birth rate continues to contract further below the 2.1 births per couple population-stable
replacement rate every year) but from immigration.
We are not only failing to educate young
people in sufficient numbers to meet the above job demands, but while our price
of post-secondary education continues to rise well-beyond the cost of living
increases, the quality of that education – particularly in public universities
where state funding continues to decline – is falling just as foreign support
for such education is rising. What exacerbates the problem, impaling the
numbers of teens who are actually ready for a vigorous college education, is
the plunging quality of public education across the land, again a product of
short-sighted state and federal funding cuts. The result: Income inequality
rises as upward mobility vaporizes. And we are faced with Trump-imposed
barriers to making up that shortfall from the overseas marketplace.
In the end, corporate America will be faced
with moving its innovation venues to foreign lands, where the expert foreign
immigrants are not treated with hostility and where visas are also accorded to
their families. It’s already happening as the Trump administration operates under
false notion of “America First.” So far, Canada has been the big winner as it
has openly courted those gifted foreign students and experts who have completed
their education – including their families – to settle and work in the Great
North. American technologically-focused companies have cooperated by opening
new research and development centers in Canada.
By the time the United States reverses these
immigration policies, as it invariably must, the patterns of foreign experts
choosing to join those who preceded them into a culturally welcoming venue
(read: not the United States) may be so embedded that the United States will
not be able to restore what once made “America Great.” We are, after all, a
nation of immigrants. Oh, and those fears of foreign terrorists sneaking in?
Well, aside from the fact that the vast bulk of terrorists mounting attacks in
the United States are all-American, born and bred, you may notice the
surprising paucity of foreign terrorist attacks in Canada.
I’m
Peter Dekom, and the real world ignores meaningless slogan-driven political
movements, choosing instead to pit their best and the brightest against the
truly best and the brightest of every other nation against which they compete.
No comments:
Post a Comment