It’s
all about the “pictures.” Kids being torn apart from their parents are “bad
visuals” as Donald Trump confided to his GOP comrades at a recent White House
meeting. The Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” border policy – arresting
illegal border crossers under criminal statutes – mandates that any minor
children accompanying such criminally charged adults be separated and housed
under federal supervision. Mostly, that means internment camps for these
children, mats on the floor, little or no activities for these youngsters, and
basic food and medical care. Toddlers in tears. Some move into foster care, but
almost 2,000 of such separated children were lost in the system. Even the few
“tender age” (under thirteen) facilities offer rather cold care.
Prime
ministers and other top government leaders (UK, France, Canada, Germany,
Mexico, the Pope, U.N. Secretary General, etc.) uniformly condemned this policy
that results in such separation of kids from their families. Comparison to Nazi
internment practices, while unfairly extreme, were everywhere. Child
psychologists also uniformly condemned this practice, suggesting that many of
these young children could be permanently and irretrievably damaged (including
susceptibility to diseases and disorders) as a result.
The
political optics, not the harsh treatment of little children, seem to have
defined a Republican reaction. GOP leaders suggested that these “bad pictures”
could negatively impact mid-term election results. However, even as Melania
Trump and Laura Bush strongly objected to this separation of children from
their parents, Trump seemed to double down. Despite the fact that Trump and his
Attorney General ordered the new policy, Trump blamed the Democrats for it all.
His base rallied to his support. “We have to stop crying over these kids,” said
one heartless and hypocritical evangelical on CNN.
What’s
more, Trump seemed particularly distressed that border-crossers had any “due
process” rights before immigration judges. “‘I don’t want judges. I want border
security,’ Trump said in an extraordinary attack on the long-standing
immigration courts system. ‘We have to have a real border. Not judges.
Thousands and thousands of judges they want to hire. Who are these people?’”
Los Angeles Times, June 20th. Once again, our Constitution and
statutes were getting in the way of Trump’s wishes. Scary, huh. A tad
autocratic? How do American’s fee about this issue.
“According to a Quinnipiac University survey released
on Monday [6/18], 66 percent of American voters oppose the ‘zero tolerance’
policy, enacted in April, that has resulted in more than 2,000 children being
separated from their families. Just 27 percent of the survey respondents
approve… But the majority of Republicans [55%] support it.” Yahoo.com. Still
the election optics continued to terrify the GOP leadership. They pressed the
President for a corrective executive order, despite Trump’s claim he had no
power to do so.
“Faced with the president’s resistance
to act, however, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told reporters at the
Capitol that Senate Republicans would devise ‘a plan that keeps families
together.’…The plan seems likely to accomplish that by detaining families as a
whole, not by allowing them to be free pending a deportation hearing, as was
typically the case until last month.
“McConnell’s
deputy, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), said the Senate could act ‘in a matter of
days, hopefully this week.’ More than a dozen Senate Republicans signed a
letter to Atty. Gen. Jeff Sessions urging him to suspend family separations
until a legislative fix can be signed into law.
“‘I
don’t think anyone has the patience to let him hold children hostage for a
wall,’ one senior Republican aide in the Senate said. ‘He can get that funding
the old-fashioned way, through a budget request.’
“It
remained unclear, however, whether House Republicans would go along. And Senate
Democrats, believing they have the upper hand politically, are resisting giving
Republicans help to fix the issue… ‘Legislation is not the way to go here, when
it’s so easy for the president to sign it,’ Senate Minority Leader Charles E.
Schumer (D-N.Y.) told reporters.” Los Angeles Times, June 20th.
During
a self-congratulatory press conference at the White House Wednesday (6/20)
morning – a gathering of GOP congress-people and cabinet officers (only one
woman there) presided by Trump – Trump was beginning to be ready to sign an
executive order that would keep families together.
After excoriating both the George W Bush and
Barack Obama presidencies on their weak immigration stance, again blaming the
Democrats for the entire problem and attacking the press for disseminating fake
news, the President made it very clear that he would not show any weakness in
his determination to secure the border, even preferring to be perceived as
“heartless” as opposed to “weak.” Still, the pressure from Republicans mounted.
Notwithstanding
Donald Trump’s blatantly false assertion that his “hands were tied” and that
only “Congress alone” could ameliorate this separation of children from their
parents issue, finally Trump partially relented to sign an executive order
(subject to court review and intending to serve as a stop-gap measure pending
Congressional action) allowing families to be detained together (“zero tolerance” continues). Trump blinked and
contradicted everything he had stated on the issue. But nothing proposed in Congress
had any semblance of sufficient support to get a bill passed. But wait, there’s
more.
America’s
growing reputation as a heartless plutocracy under the leadership of a wannabe
autocrat seems to be solidifying. Another example? Even as the United Nations
has found Israel’s particular use of lethal force unjustified and excessive against
rock and bottle-throwing Gazans whose frustration with living in a jobless and
decimated landscape with limited access to food, water, and even electricity
has exploded in frustration, the United States “has pulled out of the United Nations Human Rights Council, calling it a
‘cesspool of political bias.’
“Nikki
Haley, the US envoy to the UN, said it was a ‘hypocritical’ body that ‘makes a
mockery of human rights.’… Formed in 2006, the Geneva-based council has faced
criticism in the past for allowing member countries with questionable human
rights records… But activists said the US move could hurt efforts to monitor
and address human rights abuses around the world.
“Announcing
the decision to quit the council, Ms Haley described the council as a
‘hypocritical and self-serving organisation’ that displayed ‘unending hostility
towards Israel.’” BBC.com, June 20th. But except for the United
States and a very, very small coterie of other nations (like Guatemala), Israel
remains a global outcast for its West Bank settlements, treatment of local
Arabs and its disproportionate use of force against those Arabs even for
relatively minor issues.
We
are declaring unilateral tariffs, which will undoubtedly be resolved (hopefully
before a major recession is triggered), Trump is finding ways to cut medical
benefits from those who need them most, our president cannot give up insulting
world leaders and anyone who disagrees with his increasingly flawed
perspective, and our policies are globally seen as inhumane and focused only on
empowering the elite at the expense of everyone else. Trump’s base loves every extreme
Trumpian moment as we reach levels of polarization unseen since the Civil War.
We have the most negative global image in our nation’s entire history, our
influence is plunging and our credibility vaporizing.
I’m Peter Dekom, and I am beginning
to believe that restoring this nation to the democracy our Founding Fathers
intended just may no longer be possible.
No comments:
Post a Comment