In
ye olden times, there were no bankruptcy laws. Merry Olde England provided
seemingly-permanent hospitality to those who did not pay their bills. Debtors
were detained in “debtors’” prisons (see above) until someone made good their
obligations. Being in debt was simply a crime. In other societies, debtors were
placed into forced and miserable labor until they “earned” their way to freedom,
often shipped to distant lands. Many never made it out. Even today there are
debtors’ prisons (try the United Arab Emirates on for size) for those who
cannot pay their bills.
But
there the only penalty for a nation that cannot control its need to borrow is a
possible devaluation of the underlying currency and a massive ongoing tax
burden on its citizens to pay the escalating and compounding interest (not to
mention the need to pay down principal) of such sovereign debt. That tax burden
cannot hold to sustainable levels unless there are equally massive cuts in
government spending. Military expenditures are often held sacred, so the
sacrificial lambs are government services, and usually these cuts fall most
heavily on social programs, as well as infrastructure replacement or needed
build-outs, government-sponsored research and education.
Government
services tend to support the poor or provide a basic healthcare for as many
people as possible, but as you can clearly see from GOP-dominated politics,
getting people out of any form of protected healthcare (allowing no premium
increases for preexisting conditions or complex ailments and eliminating
aggregate cost caps on medical services) or any governmental support has become
“job one” for the GOP-led Congress and the President.
Outgoing
House Speaker Paul Ryan (R – WI) has made it clear that cutting Social
Security, Medicare (screw the old folks!), Medicaid, food stamps (and other
subsidies for the poor) and further limiting or eliminating the last vestiges
of the Affordable Care Act (ACA/Obamacare) are GOP priorities for the coming
congressional sessions.
My June 22nd blog, Medicrisis,
details some of the recent Trump-administration efforts to unravel the ACA
through administrative actions; Trump openly brags of the damage he has done to
the program, an effort to provide healthcare to as many Americans as possible.
The
Trump administration is also moving to a flank attack on the Affordable Care
Act in the courts. “The Trump administration is urging a federal court to
dismantle two of the most popular provisions of Obamacare, but to delay taking
such drastic action until after the midterm elections this fall.
“Responding
to a lawsuit from conservative states seeking to invalidate the Affordable Care
Act, the Justice Department told a judge in Texas on Thursday that Congress’
decision to repeal the penalty for failing to buy health insurance renders
unconstitutional other Obamacare language banning insurers from charging people
more or denying them coverage based on a pre-existing condition.
“The
Texas-led lawsuit filed in February claims that the recent elimination of
Obamacare’s individual mandate penalty means that the whole health care law
should now be ruled invalid. The mandate penalty was wiped out effective in
2019 as part of the GOP tax law passed late last year, H.R. 1 (115).
“The
administration's [recent court] filing says it agrees with states bringing the
suit that the individual mandate is unconstitutional, as are two of the law’s
major insurance provisions meant to protect people with expensive medical
conditions. With the filing, the Trump administration is asking the courts to
wipe out protections that many congressional Republicans were wary of
eliminating in their failed efforts to repeal Obamacare.” Politico.com, June 8th.
Education
Secretary, Betsy DeVos, continues on her mission to extract the federal
government from supporting public primary and secondary public education across
the land and is endeavoring to tighten up the student loan program to push more
costs on post-high school education at every level. Donald Trump is formulating
a wholesale transfer of infrastructure projects to the private sector, thus
allowing for-profit companies charge the public for the use of increasingly
numbers of bridges, highways, dams and other obvious public assets that have
traditionally been funded through tax dollars.
But
why is all this even necessary? We’ve massively increased defense spending, but
it seems pretty clear that the underlying cause has to lie substantially on the
GOP’s recent massive reduction in tax revenues, a tax cut that pretty much went
to that wealthiest segment of America, in the midst of a great cycle of
prosperity for the wealthiest in our country, who really did not need the
windfall. What’s even worse, the pledge that that tax windfall would be used to
create solid jobs has apparently fallen on deaf ears. Mostly it’s going into
stock-backs and dividends, not new jobs. In fact, to make things worse, Trump’s
tariff battle is already beginning to cost this nation in both manufacturing
and agricultural jobs.
What
makes this plutocratic earnings shift even more problematical is the impact on
our national debt, noted above. “The tax cuts championed by President Trump are
helping push the nation toward an unprecedented level of debt, heightening the
risk of another financial crisis, according to the nonpartisan Congressional
Budget Office… The budget office’s annual look at the government’s long-term
financial outlook paints a grim picture, projecting soaring deficits in the
coming years, with debt ultimately peaking at more than 152% of the nation’s
gross domestic product.
“‘The
prospect of large and growing debt poses substantial risks for the nation and
presents policymakers with significant challenges,’ Keith Hall, director of the
budget office, said in a statement… The federal debt currently stands at about
$15 trillion, or 78% of the size of U.S. economy. If current trends continue,
it will roughly equal the size of the economy within a decade, the budget
office said. The last time the debt burden hit that level was just after World
War II.
“The
biggest problem in the coming decade stems from last year’s tax cut. It is
estimated to increase the deficit by more than $2.3 trillion over the decade…
And that’s under an optimistic scenario. Under the tax law, individual income
tax rates are set to increase sharply at the end of the decade, while corporate
taxes remain low. If Congress allows that individual tax hike to take effect,
the tax cut’s long-term impact on the debt will begin to fade after the next 10
years.
“But
if Congress balks at that big tax increase — many members of Congress already
have said they want to make the individual cuts permanent — the red ink would
be even worse than projected, the budget office said.” Los Angeles Times, June
27th. So if you think this country is being run for “most of us,”
think again. If you are not in the top 5% of earners or wealth-holders, this
ain’t your time or your country. Just keep writing those tax checks to pay the
interest and principal on all that money you gave to some of the richest people
on earth.
I’m Peter Dekom, and we have a form
of government that is directed at benefitting a tiny minority of mega-wealthy
individuals and companies… at the expense of everyone and everything else.
No comments:
Post a Comment