There’s
a wonderful mythology, which I have blogged many times before, the underlies
Donald Trump’s economic policies: foreign competition (trade imbalance) and
high taxes stifle job-creation. He does seem to like to attach his tax reform
gift to the rich who didn’t need it as the cause of a solid stock market and
lower unemployment rate. That the upward economic trend line is just a rather
direct and linear extension of the post-Great Recession recovery that actually
began years before Donald Trump even ran for office, and certainly long before
that mega-drop in corporate taxes, seems to fall on his deaf ears.
The
numbers seem to tell us that the job market was largely unaffected by that tax
cut, but companies have instead used those windfall resources to pay their
shareholders extra dividends and to buy back their own stock to drive their
share price higher. That’s just moving numbers around, but the resulting
cutbacks in social programs, particularly in healthcare, have just increased
the cost of living for most of us.
Foreign
competition and trade imbalances are the issues of the late 1990s and first few
years of this century. Hardly issues for the current era. Trump’s obsession
with bring manufacturing jobs “back to the United States” mistakenly equates that
effort to more and better jobs here. But while manufacturing is “re-shoring”
like never before (the tariff war might stop that dead in its tracks), that
trend is about automation not foreign
competition. Those who own automated machines make the money… and they don’t
need to hire expensive labor instead.
Just
as coal is not going to re-accelerate as the energy-driving fuel of the future
– it’s dirty and demand for the stuff has been plummeting for decades –
manufacturing jobs are rapidly vaporizing too. Oh sure, some really specialized
manufacturing jobs might remain, but over the next five or six years, you can
expect an average 20% to 25%
fewer jobs in this sector, depending on specific skill, even as we bring more
manufacturing back to the U.S.
“Manufacturing jobs
once provided a ladder to the middle class for millions of Americans, but
opportunities for a lifetime career on the assembly line have been
declining for years due to technological changes and outsourcing. And we might
not have hit bottom yet.
“The statistics bureau
provides data for a variety of manufacturing and factory jobs, and the outlook
is bleak for nearly all of them. The number of forging machine setters,
operators, and tenders will shrink by 21% by 2024. Cutting-machine jobs will decline
by about 21%, as well. Jobs for model makers and pattern makers will fall by
22%.
“But not all
manufacturing jobs are vanishing. In the next decade, companies will need to
hire more people for highly skilled manufacturing jobs, including those who
can operate and program computer-controlled machines. The number of jobs in
this area will grow by 18% to 204,700.” CheatSheet.com, July 5th.
But Donald Trump is telling the world that our trade imbalance is a direct
result of employment-killing foreign competition, and no a word about what his
billionaire cronies are really doing to kill jobs: installing lots of
artificially intelligent automation and getting rid of people. In addition to
decimating manufacturing jobs, automated systems will tank clerical, sales,
research, financial, legal and even medical jobs at every level of education
and expertise.
The setting of high
tariffs to control imports has really never worked in the modern era. The
infamous Smoot Hawley Tariff, imposed by the feds in 1930 to create more U.S.
jobs by making foreign manufactures more expensive, actually killed a
struggling job market and extended the Great Depression by years. And in
today’s world, where there is a mixture of components from different countries,
the manufacturing process is anything but simple to attack with nation-specific
tariffs.
Watching Harley
Davidson being forced out of the U.S. because the hike in steel and aluminum
prices because of the Trump tariff has an even sadder component. While they
have to keep prices stable to continue their European sales (bikes would cost a
couple of thousand more each if they were made in the U.S.) – about 15% of
their business – that so many Harley buyers are staunch Trump supporters could
decimate their core business here in the U.S. Trump loyalists could stop buying
Harleys… and bankruptcy could be just around the corner.
Likewise, construction
costs have skyrocketed, bringing many building efforts to a grinding halt. Any
companies that use steel and aluminum – from appliance makers to the automotive
industry – are likely to see sales plummet from the higher, tariff-driven
costs.
Then come the
resulting layoffs, and even foreign companies like BMW (which has a huge factory
in South Carolina) and Toyota (with plants in Kentucky and Indiana) that
brought auto manufacturing jobs to the United States by the thousands will be
forced into cutbacks. Retaliatory tariffs are equally likely to hurt American
companies, particularly Trump-supporting farmers in the Mid-West, as countries
like China simply stop buying those exports altogether (bye, bye, soy beans).
And China has more
than a few dirty tricks up its sleeve that simply make it really difficult for
Americans trying to do business there. They are not retaliatory tariffs, but
they have the same impact. Stories abound as vital fruit and vegetable
containers lie idle pending some delay in inspection… rotting in their boxes…
and thus have to be sent back. Inspections, delays, enforcing nit-picking rules
and challenging even minor errors in forms are China’s “unofficial” reply to
Mr. Trump’s attempt to bully them into trade and tariff concessions.
Citing the necessary
statutory requirement of a finding of a national security threat, the only way
the law allows the President to set such tariffs, the Trump administration has
clearly labeled Canada and Europe as such national security threats… turning
allies into enemies. Republicans are now “whatever Trump wants” automatons,
even though it has always been a core GOP value to foster “free trade.” Could
this trigger another big recession? Especially if Trump holds his current line?
I would be shocked if that did not happen, although it might kick in after the November elections.
I’m Peter Dekom, and you have to know that, while reasonable
concessions are possible, there is a growing international movement to oppose
Trump policies at every turn.
No comments:
Post a Comment