Donald
Trump severely underestimates the power and commitment of the People’s Republic
of China. He may not be the first president with this myopia, but he most
certainly is the least prepared to deal with the issue. Take a good look at
that that thick, dotted red line above (known as the “nine-dash line”) in the
NPR map above. China has always maintained that Taiwan was a part of the PRC,
but by relying on ancient historical territorial definitions and based on
China’s literally building a land-fill island (with a powerful airfield) in the
middle of the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea, China expanded her
territorial claims to include the entirety of the encircled sea.
Initially,
Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines and Malaysia objected, but with Donald
Trump calling our foreign policy shots with inconsistency and a rather shallow
understanding of Asian politics, these countries are facing territorial
incursions into their own justifiable territories. They began to realize that
China was calling the shots. To them, we have become an unreliable ally, ready
to withdraw with little or no reason. Anyway, the United States was doing very
little other than an occasional “freedom of navigation” effort as a U.S.
warship or aircraft cross into nine-dash sea lanes. Even Japan and South Korea
see the writing on the wall.
The
latest of these “little boundary challenges” by U.S. military forces occurred
at the beginning of October. “A Chinese warship has forced an American destroyer
to change course in the South China Sea by sailing close to it in an ‘unsafe
and unprofessional’ manner, the US Navy says.
“The
USS Decatur was sailing past the Gaven and Johnson reefs in the disputed
Spratly Islands, which China claims… The [PRC] Luyang destroyer ‘approached
within 45 yards [41m] of Decatur's bow,’ Commander Nat Christensen said… The
Chinese manoeuvre almost caused a collision, US officials said.
“‘The
US side repeatedly sends military ships without permission into seas close to
South China Seas islands, seriously threatening China's sovereignty and
security, seriously damaging Sino-US military ties and seriously harming
regional peace and stability,’ China's defence ministry said.” BBC.com, October
2nd. Sino-American relations?
If they ever were good, they are horrible now.
Yet
Trump constantly refers to PRC
President Xi Jinping as having been instrumental in enabling the détente with
Korea’s Kim Jong-un, another Trump-buddy (Trump literally telling a rally that
he “fell in love” with Kim). That Kim has not even begun to remove his nuclear
capability and is claiming a lack of reciprocity on nuclear disarmament from
the United States, doesn’t seem to restrain Trump from heaping praise on a
process that is going to take a very long time to deliver.
Meanwhile, Xi now commands a naval
fleet with more combat ships than the entire U.S. Navy, replete with silent
nuclear submarines capable of launching nuclear-tipped missiles while
underwater, a shiny new aircraft carrier, lots of high-performance stealth
aircraft and a litany of highly sophisticated warships with every defensive and
offensive weapon imaginable. Not to mention the ICBMs capable of reaching all
of the United States. We may be more sophisticated, but our forces are thinly
spread out all over the world. China’s forces are concentrated in Asia where
they clearly dominate the region. Absent an all-out war, our military has
conceded that there is little the United States can do at this stage to undo
China’s rather solidified power in the region.
China is heavily focused on exerting
hegemony over all of Asia. Xi’s “Belt and Road” initiative has begun investing
billions and billions of dollars to build massive rail and highway
infrastructure from China back through the rest of Asia, following the old Silk
Route. This connectivity would give China super-control of that region’s
economy.
As the United States unraveled the
about-to-be-signed Trans Pacific Partnership, a massive Pacific Rim
multinational trade agreement, China stepped in with an alternative agreement
that clearly excluded the United States, and was instantly warmly received.
China has become the champion of “free trade,” now that the United States has
negated that policy (which it created) and turned to isolationism and limited
bilateral trade agreements instead.
Meanwhile
the PRC-US trade war has exploded out of control. US consumer prices are
shuddering upwards. Watching China shut off their American farm-goods
purchases, US farmers are hoping that normal trade relations are restored
before Trump’s short-term agricultural bailout funds are depleted. Trump keeps
promising that China will cave, but the reverse seems to be happening;
President Xi would lose inestimable power within his own country should he give
in to U.S. demands.
As my October 1st, blog, USMCA - Winners: Big Business / Losers: The Little Guys,
points out, despite Donald Trump’s deceptive braggadocio that it was the United
States that rebuffed a “desperate” request by the PRC to resume bilateral trade
negotiations in the face of a mounting tariff war, the reverse occurred: “Chinese officials canceled the planned
negotiations after Trump announced he would impose new levies of up to
10 percent on another $200 billion in Chinese imports, effective
Monday [9/24]. Beijing vowed to strike back, slapping duties of up to 10 percent on
an additional $60 billion in American products.” Washington Post,
September 22nd.
Sure, China will eventually negotiate a trade
agreement with us, but notwithstanding an expected Trump victory lap at that
event, you can bet that China will come away with a vastly better deal than
Trump has promised his constituents. Whatever else may be said about the Trump
era, the United States has pretty much squandered decades of credibility,
influence and global power that better presidents, Republican and Democrat, had
built up during and after World War II.
How bad is it? Globally, Trump scored a nasty
70% in a Pew no-confidence survey (below Putin’s 62% and Xi’s 56%). “A
wide-ranging survey shows diminished trust in American world leadership under
Trump compared with that of his predecessor, Barack Obama — but also suggests
that many do not want to see the U.S. elbowed aside by China in terms of global
preeminence.
“[Pictures
of foreign leaders looking on with disdain or even responding with open public
laughter at Trump’s self-aggrandizement] “reinforce the findings of a global
attitudes survey released by the Pew Research Center on Monday [10/1], which
paints a picture of an increasingly isolated United States, underpinned by
doubts as to whether Trump would do the right thing in a crisis and a sense of
slipping U.S. leadership on issues such as human rights.
“‘America’s
global image plummeted following the election of President Donald Trump, amid
widespread opposition to his administration’s policies and a widely shared lack
of confidence in his leadership,’ the nonpartisan Washington-based think tank
wrote.
“The
25-nation survey, it said, found that the U.S. president’s image ‘remains poor’
in much of the world — with some notable exceptions, such as Israel, where
Trump maintains considerable popularity, and South Korea, where a watchful
public keeps a close eye on how Washington deals with volatile North Korea.”
Los Angeles Times, October 2nd. Will the world ever trust us again,
knowing that our best practices and policies can be undone by a single rogue
president? I wonder if China, when facing the United States, will finally get
tired of winning?
I’m
Peter Dekom, and it is with true sadness that I watch unfriendly world leaders,
particularly in China and Russia, play Donald Trump like a puppet at the
expense of the American people.
No comments:
Post a Comment