The
midterms are most probably going to be decided by the turnout. A low turnout,
where traditional non-voters stay away from the polls, predicts the GOP would control
of both houses of Congress and most of the contested gubernatorial seats. A
high turnout would reflect a general disenchantment with Donald Trump, the Republican
message and would include elusive younger voters and minorities whose past
apathy has kept them away in prior elections, especially those midterms where
the “big office” of president is not up for a vote.
Most
of the states released by the U.S. Supreme Court in Shelby County vs. Holder (2013) from federal voter-policy monitoring
under the amended Voting Rights Act of 1965 have since mounted a concerted
effort to restrict minority access to voting polls. Georgia’s Secretary of
State, himself a candidate for Governor, has used the excuse of slight
deviation in using initials in name or other minor changes to eliminate more
than 50 thousand voters, mostly from minority areas, from being able to vote.
Other
states mandate government-issued photo IDs as proof of eligibility (but if you
can’t afford a car, you are not likely to have the required ID), while moving
polling stations to lily-white neighborhoods far from minority enclaves as
other popular sets of voting restrictions. And of course, there is the
political hot potato that the Supreme Court has dodged, remanding a case back
to the lower courts that it had accepted but changed its mind, on the issue of
rampant partisan gerrymandering… the reality that allowed yet another election to
hand the presidency to a candidate who lost the popular vote by seven figures.
But
apathy remains the bane of the Democratic party. They have enough of the
relevant sentiments among the general population to win the mid-terms, but
their voting base, particularly among the young, tend not to vote particularly
on the mid-terms.
“Voters
aged 18 to 34 have cast ballots at lower rates than any other age group in
every midterm election for the last 40 years, according to Census data. Fewer
than 1 in 4 young adults voted in 2014, the last midterm election.
“Young
people are highly mobile, making them harder and more expensive to reach. For
campaigns, ‘That’s a pretty low return on investment,’ says Kei
Kawashima-Ginsberg, a Tufts University expert on the youth vote. ‘Once that
perception is settled, it’s really hard to change strategies around it.’
“Her
research center has ranked the top 50 congressional districts where a surge in
youth voters could make a difference in close races. Eight are in California.
“The
picture here has been even more grim. In 2014, only about 15% of California’s
1.8 million registered young voters bothered to turn out in November, according
the California Civic Engagement Project.
“‘Is
that a problem or is that an opportunity?’ [billionaire liberal activist Tom] Steyer
said in an interview. ‘It’s the most diverse group in American history, biggest
group, most progressive ... and they don’t vote, so let’s ignore them? Really?’”
Los Angeles Times, October 22nd. While cost considerations are a
strategic factor for any political party, this time the Dems are significantly
out-raising their Republican counterparts. Steyer’s NextGen America advocacy
group has pledged $33 million to engage young voters in 11 states — $3.5
million alone in California.
But
will it work?
On
the heels of his tax reform act, an economic failure that Trump has convinced
his base was a big winner, raw unemployment statistics with a hefty stock
market valuation, and his success overcoming “meToo” issues and placing another
conservative on the Supreme Court, despite his erratic and unstable governing
side, Donald Trump is enjoying record popularity. An NBC/Wall Street Journal
poll “found that 47 percent of
respondents approve of the job Trump is doing as president, while 49 percent
disapprove. That is the best he's done in the NBC/WSJ poll since taking office.
And it represents a major jump in the president's popularity; the same poll
found him with a 39 percent approval rating six months ago.” USA Today, October
22nd.
Are
there enough angry women ignored by the GOP, gun-terrified late-teenagers,
young folks with intolerable student loan debt, minorities who have been
further left behind and folks who remain aghast at Trump’s rather blasé
approach to morality and decorum to make a difference? Or will Trump’s rising
popularity and strong economic numbers numb the nation to maintaining GOP
dominance across the land?
I’m Peter Dekom, and those who whine
about our current political polarized mess and the clear and increasing
isolation of the United States in a world of nations should take a pledge of
silence… unless they actually vote!
No comments:
Post a Comment