Sunday, February 3, 2019
Nuke ‘em High!
In the mid-1980s, as nuclear missiles were
adding multiple warheads, shorter range missiles were capable of delivering a quick
Russian nuclear first strike against Europe… and vice versa. Tensions were
high. “By the time President Ronald Reagan and
Mikhail S. Gorbachev, the Soviet leader at the time, negotiated the deal to ban
the weapons in 1987, the intermediate-range missiles had come to be seen as a
hair trigger for nuclear war because of their short flight times — as little as
10 minutes.
“This was particularly troubling
to the Soviet command, which could be destroyed by a ‘bolt from the blue’
strike before it could order a retaliatory attack. Partly in response to this
shortcoming, Moscow developed a ‘dead hand’ trigger to fire its arsenal at
the United States without an order from the leadership, based on computers
interpreting radiation and seismic sensors.
“The treaty prohibited
land-based cruise or ballistic missiles with ranges between 311 miles and 3,420
miles. It did not cover air- or sea-launched weapons, such as the American
Tomahawk and Russian Kalibr cruise missiles fired from ships, submarines or
airplanes, although those missiles fly similar distances.” New York Times,
February 1st. That “dead hand” was a Russian automated system was
purportedly able to detect a strike much faster than human analysis… and launch
a counterstrike without a human decision. What could possibly go wrong?
The result was the 1987 U.S.-Russian Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF)
that banned such weapons. In the mid-1980s, there were an estimated 65 thousand
nuclear warheads scattered around the world. Though the INF and other treaties,
today there are an estimated 8 thousand such warheads deployed, too many but a
whole lot fewer than in the crazy 1980s.
Given Vladimir
Putin’s rather obvious desire to recapture those nations that were either part
of the Soviet Union or well-within the Soviet Bloc, lost when the USSR
collapsed, combined with his obvious desire to play the United States and ramp
back up to returning as an equal military/nuclear power, he just could not help
himself. Putin ordered the design and construction of a whole new generation of
medium-range missiles, a direct violation of the IFN Treaty.
Meanwhile,
the Russians claim to have developed, soon to be fully deployed, a missile
capable of flying 20 times faster than the speed of sound, unmatched by any
other missile, one that can automatically evade any current and expected
technology that could be used to shoot it down. It’s called the Avangard. American
sensors detected a ship-based launch of a Russian missile that could achieve
Mach 8 (8 times the speed of sound, 2 miles a second, 6138 mph) on December 10th.
Putin was bragging to the world. One minor catch: this missile was a flagrant
violation of the INF Treaty.
Seems
that Putin has been violating that INF Treaty for quite a while. “According to information dating to the Obama
administration, it seems so. During the 2014 crisis in Ukraine, the United
States accused Russia of violating the treaty by deploying prohibited tactical
nuclear weapons designed to intimidate Europe and the former Soviet states that
have aligned with the West.
“President Barack Obama personally informed President
Vladimir V. Putin of Russia in a letter that the United States believed the
Russians were violating the treaty, but that he wanted to resolve the issue
through dialogue and preserve the accord.”
NY Times. Simply-put, by violating that treaty, Russia has developed its
nuclear capacity beyond U.S. weapons and weapons-defense technology.
On February 1st, Department of
State Secretary Mike Pompeo formally announced that the United States was
withdrawing from the INF Treaty. Putin responded in kind a day later. “But adding to a sense that the broader
architecture of nuclear disarmament has started to unravel, Mr. Putin also said that Russia would
build weapons previously banned under the treaty and would no longer initiate
talks with the United States on any matters related to nuclear arms control.”
NY Times, February 2nd. China immediately noted that this
turn of events could easily trigger a new nuclear arms race, the likes of which
the world has never seen before.
The Trump administration strategy suggests
that, for example, that if too many people break the law (like murderous gun
homicides in Chicago), the effort should not be to punish the perpetrators but
simply to repeal the law itself. Trump dislikes multinational treaties. He thinks
even the multination European Union should be dissolved and somehow believes
that multiparty negotiations are a waste of time. He applies his business deal
experience, bilateral agreements, to global issues. However, instead of
pressuring Russia, ramping up the consequences for a breach of that INF Treaty,
Trump has simply let Russia off the hook to continue to grow its nuclear
arsenal with no real leverage to stop the obvious.
To anyone schooled in international arms
limitations negotiations, everything about Trump’s approach is a powerful
reflection of both inexperience and a lack of even trying to understand the
underlying variables. Putin’s pursuit of his new superweapons has received a
greenlight from Donald Trump!
I’m Peter Dekom, and Donald Trump is also
spearheading the new going-forward denuclearization talks with Kim Jong-un; is
anyone concerned?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment