2019 began with U.S. companies short of the capital they need to entertain their own stated expansion goals – assuming that now that the federal government shutdown has ended, a trade agreement with China is finally settled and Brexit woes do not tank the global economy. A lot of assumptions with a volatile President in office. If the economy were to settle down, now with projected growth under the earlier 3% GDP estimate, why in the world would corporate America lack growth capital after the massive governmental give-away masquerading as the much-touted, GOP-passed Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2018, dropping the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% in one fell swoop?
Sunday, March 3, 2019
A Shameful Boast
2019 began with U.S. companies short of the capital they need to entertain their own stated expansion goals – assuming that now that the federal government shutdown has ended, a trade agreement with China is finally settled and Brexit woes do not tank the global economy. A lot of assumptions with a volatile President in office. If the economy were to settle down, now with projected growth under the earlier 3% GDP estimate, why in the world would corporate America lack growth capital after the massive governmental give-away masquerading as the much-touted, GOP-passed Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2018, dropping the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% in one fell swoop?
About 6% of the additional revenue
retained by corporate America went into new jobs, mostly high-salary
professional/STEM employment. The balance went into dividends for shareholders
but mostly for stock buybacks that enhanced the value of the holdings of
existing shareholders. About three quarters of a trillion dollars’ worth. That
tax-related corporate cash is long gone. That promised “trickle down” benefit
from the mega-rich to the rest simply did not happen.
A few in red states (state and local
taxes, no longer deductible, are much lower than blue urban states) got very
small middle-class tax breaks; those in urban blue states got shocking
increases in their federal taxes. And sure, there are lots of new lower level
jobs as the unemployment numbers suggest, but those promised plum-pay jobs… not
so much. More gig work too… without those coveted corporate fringe benefits
like paid vacation, solid healthcare and retirement accounts.
The stock market went from a 2018
high to a roller-coaster of volatility, effectively losing all of the share
gains by the end of the year. But what all Americans really got, once
considered a sacrilege to Republicans, was a whopping increase in the federal
deficit without the level promised offsets from a stronger economy. Even as
this tax reform act passed and was smilingly signed by the President last year,
as companies cheered the result, more sober voices suggested that what looked
good now was likely to turn into a disaster in the coming years.
Ironically released on the Ides of
March (March 15, 2018), Fortune Magazine warned: “Trump’s heady economic
potion, however, is masking misguided policies that could leave those same
[joyful U.S.] businesses with a severe hangover from today’s celebration. The
U.S. government’s huge and growing budget deficits have become gargantuan
enough to threaten the great American growth machine. And Trump’s policies to
date—a combination of deep tax cuts and sharp spending increases—are shortening
the fuse on that fiscal time bomb, by dramatically widening the already
unsustainable gap between revenues and outlays. On our current course, we’re
headed for a morass of punitive taxes, puny growth, and stagnant incomes for
workers—a future that’s the precise opposite of what Trump champions.
“By 2028, America’s government debt
burden could explode from this year’s $15.5 trillion to a staggering $33
trillion—more than 20% bigger than it would have been had Trump’s agenda not
passed. At that point, interest payments would absorb more than $1 in $5 of
federal revenue, crippling the government’s capacity to bolster the economy,
and constraining the private sector too. Contrary to the claims of the
President and his supporters, the U.S. can’t grow fast enough to shed this
burden; indeed, Trump’s agenda on immigration and trade looks likely to stunt
that growth. (More on that later.) ‘This is almost like climate change,’ says
Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics. ‘It doesn’t do you in this
year, or next year, but you’ll see the ill effects in a day of reckoning.’”
That we have just added the
additional interest we have to pay every year to maintain the federal deficit
is bad enough, but with this massive flood of new government debt seeking
global lenders, those lenders seem to want higher interest rates. While the
United States has an enviable AAA rating, the government shutdown coupled with
an irrational and unpredictable president who has lost massive international
credibility, the possibility of a reduction in that rating (which would further
kick-up those interest rates) looms large. Should that occur, the strength of
the U.S. dollar will obviously fall against other currencies, which will add a
further press for higher interest rates to place our deficit debt.
You can witness that upward pressure
in federal bond auctions, where the government seeks to place some of its
deficit debt. “Of the $2.4 trillion of notes and bonds the Treasury Department
offered last year, investors submitted bids for just 2.6 times that amount,
data compiled by Bloomberg show. That’s less than in any year since 2008 when
the financial crisis was in full swing. The bid-to-cover ratio, as it’s known,
fell even as benchmark Treasury yields soared to multiyear highs in October,
before falling back to their lows last month [December]…
“Debt supply jumped in 2018 largely
because of the Trump administration’s tax cuts. Forecasts show the deficit
could soon swell past a trillion dollars and stay that way for years to come… The
weakness ‘doesn’t matter until it suddenly does,’ says Torsten Slok, Deutsche
Bank’s chief international economist. ‘A declining bid-to-cover ratio increases
the vulnerability and probability that investors suddenly will begin to think
that a falling bid-to-cover ratio is important. Put differently, all fiscal
crises begin with a declining bid-to-cover ratio.’
“The first note auction of 2019 did
little to ease those worries. The Treasury sold $38 billion of three-year notes
Tuesday [1/8], matching the biggest sale since 2010. The bid-to-cover ratio was
the lowest since 2009… It will follow up Wednesday [1/16, it did], with a
$24-billion sale of 10-year notes, which yield 2.73%.
“The Treasury has enlarged its
auctions for four straight quarters, surpassing levels last seen in 2009.
What’s more, the U.S. has grown more reliant on the public to finance its
deficit as the Federal Reserve scales back its purchases of Treasurys [sic] to
shrink its $4 trillion of crisis-era bond holdings.” Los Angeles Times (from
Bloomberg), January 10th. The first four months of 2019 have already
produced a 77% increase in the deficit from the same time last year!
Not to worry as the GOP has a simple
solution, one that has zero chance of passing through a Democrat-majority
House: cut Social Security, Medicare, Supplemental Nutritional Assistance
Program (SNAP – food stamps), Medicaid, coverage under the Affordable Care Act,
etc. But if the Republicans were to regain control of both houses of Congress
and the presidency in 2020, guess what retirees and those in need will get?
I’m Peter Dekom, and the Tax Cuts and Jobs
Act of 2018 may turn out to be the biggest disaster of the Trump presidency,
eclipsing both his scandals and his appointment of unqualified and biased
activist right-wing judges.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment