I hear it all the time. “People
aren’t so nice anymore.” “There’s something, a tension everywhere. It’s not all
peace and love like the movements in the 1960s and 70s.” “The American dream is
dead.” “Upward mobility has pretty much vaporized.” “Everyone’s trying to get
an edge.” Even those who are going well in this economy, the mega-rich who have
never been richer, sense the unease. Few think things are going to get better
is the societal expectation. Younger generations don’t expect a better quality
of life than that of the parents. We are horribly and perhaps inconsolably
polarized. Politics has been reduced to name-calling and “fake news.” The only
sure thing: uncertainty.
Why? Malthusian overpopulation?
Climate change decimating agriculture, wreaking havoc through ultra-violent
storm patterns, coastal erosion, flooding, fires, droughts and rising
temperatures? Automation replacing legions of blue, and now white, collar
workers? Regional conflicts driving hordes of desperate people to leave their
homelands to migrate seeking hope and salvation, only to be greeted by hatred
and anger? Ultra, “my God is right and yours must be purged,” religiosity as a
reaction to all this? Old world developed economies dependent on social
programs that those who can afford it will not pay for against desperate and
displaced citizens demanding support and attention? Scarce resources with more
mouths to feed? The decline of the West, and the rise of the East? Autocratic
leaders, driven to “solve” these issues with simple slogans, willing to destroy
democracy to advance their own power, promising what they can never deliver?
All of the above?
The rise of hate crimes (related to
negative racial, ethnic, sexual-orientation and religious motivation)
throughout the Western world, particularly in the United States, has increased
with frightening speed. Historically, hate crimes are often a precursor to
legitimizing attacking these traditional victims, scapegoating them, and
ultimately assaulting, killing or banishing them. What was a crime becomes
acceptable and even required behavior. Think Jews in Hitler’s Germany, the
Rohingya in Myanmar, ethnic Chinese in Indonesia, Boko Haram slaughtering
Christians, etc., etc. The signs are everywhere, hate crimes and shootings of
unarmed people of color, gay-bashing, from an anti-Muslim slaughter in
Christchurch, New Zealand to the march of some “very fine,” torch-bearing white
supremacists in Charlottesville, Virginia.
Donald Trump is hardly the cause of this ugly
trend; he has just legitimized those who harbor these malevolent intentions
against those who are “different.” Blame is the easy game of autocrats
throughout the ages. The Washington Post recently asked if there might be a
correlation between areas where Donald Trump holds his rallies – often laced
with rather openly “nationalistic” us against them racist/ethnic suggestions –
and a rise in hate crimes in those states. “Using
the Anti-Defamation League’s Hate, Extremism, Anti-Semitism, Terrorism map data
(HEAT map), we examined whether there was
a correlation between the counties that hosted one of Trump’s 275 presidential
campaign rallies in 2016 and increased incidents of hate crimes in subsequent
months.
“To test this, we aggregated
hate-crime incident data and Trump rally data to the county level and then used
statistical tools to estimate a rally’s impact. We included controls for
factors such as the county’s crime rates, its number of active hate groups, its
minority populations, its percentage with college educations, its location in
the country and the month when the rallies occurred.
“We found that counties that had
hosted a 2016 Trump campaign rally saw a 226 percent increase in reported hate
crimes over comparable counties that did not host such a rally… Additionally,
it is hard to discount a “Trump effect” when a considerable number of these
reported hate crimes reference Trump. According to the ADL’s 2016 data, these incidents included
vandalism, intimidation and assault.
“What’s more, according to
the FBI’s Universal Crime report in 2017, reported
hate crimes increased 17 percent over 2016. Recent research also shows that reading or
hearing Trump’s statements of bias against particular groups makes people more
likely to write offensive things about the groups he targets.” Washington Post,
March 22, 2019. Much of this statistical analysis was done through a group of professors
and their graduate students at the University of North Texas. Whether the
United States erupts into a self-inflicted civil war remains an open question,
but this lurch to the nationalistic right is hardly uniquely American. The
waves of nationalistic, ethnic-racist populism are surging across Europe as
well.
As extreme French populist,
Marine Le Pen lost handily in the 2017 election, many in Europe saw that as a
sign that Trump-style populism would not find traction in Europe. “Leaders like Emmanuel Macron, whose
2017 election as French president was widely — and in retrospect, perhaps
incorrectly — seen as a sign that the populist wave sweeping the continent had
crested, place their faith in the European project, exemplified by common
values, goals and interests.” Los Angeles Times, May 22nd. But with
a looming election for representatives to the European Union’s Parliament, the
populist movement is anything but dead. Even Marie Le Pen is back and rising
fast.
“Five years ago, Brexit wasn’t even a
blip on the horizon. Populist and extreme-right parties were mainly political
sideshows. The pillars of the postwar order — the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization, the European Union — were weathering occasional family squabbles
but hardly riven by existential threats. And the transatlantic relationship
hadn’t been turned on its head by an impetuous U.S. president who speaks far
more harshly of traditional European allies than he does of tyrants such as
North Korea’s Kim Jong Un .
“This time around, it’s an entirely
different landscape. When four-day balloting for the European Union’s
legislative body begins Thursday [5/23], starting with votes in Britain and the
Netherlands, mainstream parties that have held sway for decades face an
unprecedented insurgency by anti-establishment movements…
“Led by Italy’s hard-line deputy
prime minister, Matteo Salvini, the [a right-wing assemblage of European
leaders in Milan] denounced ‘out-of-control’ immigration — even though numbers
of migrants arriving in Europe have dropped off dramatically since 2015, which
saw a surge in arrivals from war-torn Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan.
“‘Working in concert with parties
such as Germany’s Alternative for Germany and the Dutch Freedom Party, whose
platform largely rests on anti-Muslim sentiment, Salvini’s alliance hopes to
wind up as the European Parliament’s fourth-largest group.
“But the Milan gathering did not
include Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban , whom the far-right movement
considers one of its brightest stars. He says he may remain allied with the
centrist parliament bloc and try to move it rightward. Orban has also shown no
interest in joining forces with Le Pen…
“Salvini and his would-be coalition
partners have seized upon the notion that immigrants, especially from Muslim
countries, pose a threat to ‘European’ culture — often used in that context as
a code word for Christianity.
“Even from across the Atlantic,
President Trump is an unseen presence in the vote, some analysts said. He
hosted Orban in the Oval Office last week, and he is an enthusiastic proponent
of Brexit… His onetime senior White House strategist, Stephen K. Bannon, has
sought to play a more active role, boosting politicians such as Salvini and
denouncing Macron. The election, Bannon told the French newspaper Le Parisien
last week, is a referendum on Macron’s vision of Europe, which he derides as
unworkable.” LA Times.
No one believes that these populists
will win new majorities, but their rising presence gives them power in so many
ways. Aside from having a new and more powerful platform of influence, some of
these far-right nationalists may well be the linchpins in new coalitions if no
one party wins a clear majority. It is a disturbing trend.
“With German Chancellor Angela Merkel
having decided not to seek another term in federal elections due in 2021,
Macron has sought to take up the mantle as the leading proponent of a united
Europe.
“But as his popularity at home has
slipped, he finds himself grappling with widespread resentment over falling
living standards in rural areas.
“The ‘yellow vest’ movement has held
raucous and sometimes violent demonstrations across the country and in iconic
Parisian venues such as the Champs-Elysees. Macron, while promising to listen
to the grievances of those who feel left behind, has painted the European vote
as a referendum on moving forward with closer integration that would help the
EU compete with world powers such as the U.S. and China.
“‘Retreating into nationalism offers
nothing,’ Macron wrote in an open letter in March. ‘It is rejection without an
alternative. And this is the trap that threatens the whole of Europe.’” LA Times.
Will the pendulum swing back or is this just the beginning of a new world
running on hate and fear?
I’m Peter Dekom, and I truly feel that the
older generations have laid a terrible path for the generations who follow.
No comments:
Post a Comment