Let’s face it, the United States has
become one of least popular countries in the world, a fact which probably keeps
China from sending her troops into Hong Kong to crush the protestors. They are
happier, so far, letting the United States slide further out of favor, lose
more influence on global matters, skewer its own people with the obvious
disastrous results of its proclivity to wage trade wars, reject multinational
treaties, decimate a meaningful role in the Middle East by simply siding with
Israel on everything and helping Saudi Arabia bomb Yemini civilians, humiliating
allied leaders while elevating brutal despots… even as one of those trade wars
is hurting China. If they were to use their military to crush the protestors, China
just might make the United States a little less of a global bully by
comparison.
But one country faces a particular
conundrum over Trump-America unpopularity. The U.K. Specifically, foundering PM
Boris Johnson – rejected by an increasing number of his own party, forcing him
to lose his parliamentary conservative majority control. As Trump continues to
tweet in support of Johnson’s pure-hard-break-Brexit mantra, the position that
cost his party that majority, Boris is clearly cringing. As Trump sent Mike
Pence over to London to support Johnson with lots of photo ops, mirroring his
support for Israel’s right wing PM Benjamin Netanyahu in the last election
(Netanyahu still could not put together a ruling coalition forcing another
election), our President’s belief that his support alone can sway voters in
other countries to support his choice… his version of election interference…
may have the opposite result.
“Boris knows how to win,” Trump told
reporters in Washington on September 4th. Wince. But should Boris
distance himself from Trump’s toxicity, he faces alienating the biggest trading
partner willing to make a post-Brexit agreement of significance. A trading
partner the UK will desperately need on a hard exit. An agreement that is
itself being greeted with skepticism.
“Mistrust of U.S. motives figured in
parliamentary debate on Tuesday [9/3] and Wednesday [9/4], with the opposition
Labor Party warning that a Britain bereft of its familial trade relationship
with the EU would be vulnerable to unscrupulous practices by big American
corporations and would risk being stripped of food-safety and other consumer protections
that the United Kingdom has enjoyed as part of the European bloc.
“That led to an odd burst of
prominence for the phrase ‘chlorinated chicken’ — a reference to critics’
concerns that U.S. poultry treated with antimicrobial rinses, a practice banned
in the EU, would be foisted upon British consumers if the country eventually
signs on to a prospective American trade deal touted by both Trump and Johnson.
“But ‘chlorinated chicken’ has also
become a catchall descriptor for unease about the prospect of a post-Brexit
Britain becoming overly subservient to the United States, even as Brexit
backers portray the planned split with the EU as a triumphant assertion of
British sovereignty.
“Johnson, who became prime minister
in July, tried, with debatable success, to turn the phrase into a scathing
insult of rival Jeremy Corbyn, the Labor Party leader. During Wednesday’s
parliamentary proceedings, he called Corbyn the only chlorinated chicken in
sight — and repeated his gibe about the Labor leader to Pence the next day.
“Another sensitive topic came up in
Johnson’s meeting with Pence: the National Health Service, Britain’s flawed but
widely revered system that provides universal health coverage. Johnson’s
critics have repeatedly suggested that U.S. pharmaceutical and medical
companies would seek to muscle in post-Brexit, raising prices for drugs and
services.
“Trump did little to allay those
concerns in a state visit to the U.K. in June. With Johnson’s predecessor
Theresa May by his side, the U.S. leader was asked by a British reporter about
potential harm to the NHS arising from Brexit.
“When the president did not appear to
understand the question, May quickly interceded, spelling out what the initials
stood for, as if simply clarifying an inaudible query. But Trump alarmed many
Britons with his response that ‘when you’re dealing on trade, everything is on
the table, so — NHS or anything else.’
“Critics pounced on that, with Corbyn
tweeting that ‘our NHS is not for sale.’ On that point, Johnson voiced rare
agreement with his rival, telling Pence in their meeting that the health
service would not be part of future trade talks with Washington.” Laura King
writing for the September 6th Los Angeles Times. Ireland’s equally
unhappy with Trump’s hard Brexit support, since one of the biggest and
seemingly unsolvable issues concerns a 300-mile open Northern Ireland/Ireland
border. Open after decades of bloodshed that no one on that Emerald Isle wants
to block with a hard wall.
If the rest of the world is getting
tired of Donald Trump, noting that they are not remotely as saturated with all
things Trump 24/7 as we are, will the US electorate be so damned worn out by
all Trump, all the time that they will vote him office in part for a little
piece of mind? After all, the main source of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton
mention is Trump himself. And they truly do not matter anymore. Wouldn’t that
be a nice result for Donald Trump?
I’m
Peter Dekom, and you have to wonder what reporters on MSNBC, CNN and Fox News
will talk about in a post-Trump era… even as the Trumpster will continue to
tweet.
No comments:
Post a Comment