It’s a simple strategy. Pick a slogan
that’s popular with your constituency – like that 2016 Trump campaign “I’ll
build a wall, and Mexico will pay for it” promise – use executive orders to
change immigration policies and really create (force) the problem that your
policy is directed to “fix,” double down if the crisis is not bad enough, and
make sure your constituency knows: (i) only you can solve the problem and
(ii) the problem is getting so much worse. When roadblocks appear, like
Mexico’s not paying for the wall or Democrat resistance to authorize any
federal budget allocations for that “vanity wall” built to solve a
“manufactured crisis,” use the courts, emergency declarations and executive
orders to reallocate budgetary funding from other earlier authorizations. Like
the military budget. Shut down the government if necessary. Divide the country!
Left vs right. Choose your side!
You will be a hero to your
constituency even as the harm to the rest of the country escalates. Even as our
global image collapses in the harsh visuals of detention centers, border
children separated from their parents and hordes of those waiting at the border
who face robbers, kidnappers, rapists (the real kind), food shortages and
horrible living conditions.
Hey, at least we have a new and
“improved” corporate-driven Washington swamp that is expanding almost as fast
as the corporate benefits have grown, from financial and environmental regulatory
exemptions to a tax cut that did almost nothing but increase our deficit to
staggering proportions. Even as Hurricane Dorian provides a harsh example of
what policies built around ignoring or denying climate change cause, Trump does
not care. He prefers to double down and focus on getting that wall built. On
September 3rd, the Department of Defense issued a report outlining
exactly what reallocating approved defense appropriations into wall
construction will do to our military.
Writing for Reuters (September 4th), Idrees
Ali summarizes: “More
than 120 U.S. military construction projects will be adversely affected as the
Pentagon prepares to use $3.6 billion to help build or enhance 175 miles (282
km) of the border wall with Mexico, U.S. officials said on Tuesday [9/3].
“Earlier
this year, President Donald Trump declared a national emergency in a bid to
fund his promised wall at the U.S.-Mexico border… The emergency declaration
allows the Trump administration to use money from the military construction
budget and the Pentagon has said it could use $3.6 billion from the budget…
“Pentagon
officials said 127 [military projects] would be affected and the first $1.8
billion would come from deferred military construction projects outside the
United States. The second tranche would come from deferred military projects
inside the United States, the officials said… Elaine McCusker, the deputy under
secretary of defence comptroller, said construction could begin as early as
within 100 days on land owned by the Defense Department, such as the Barry
Goldwater Air Force Range in Arizona.”
The
reaction from Congressional Democrats comes as no surprise: “In a conference
call with U.S. House of Representatives Democrats, Speaker Nancy Pelosi
discussed her phone conversation with Defense Secretary Mark Esper about the
decision earlier in the day… ‘My view of it is that stealing money from
military construction, at home and abroad, will undermine our national
security, quality of life and morale of our troops, and that indeed makes
America less safe,’ Pelosi said, according to an aide.
“She
said she told Esper that Trump was negating the constitutional principle of
separation of powers, the aide said… ‘This decision will harm already planned,
important projects intended to support our service members at military
installations in New York, across the United States, and around the world,’
Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said in a statement.” Reuters.
Since
most of the illicit drugs that cross our border into the United States come
through normal ports of entry or via boats and planes, it’s pretty clear that
all a wall does for these criminals is increase the price of their product.
Bribes and complicity of travelers is more than enough “leakage” to keep that
drug flow going through traditional gates… not to mention the flow of easily
purchased assault weapons (in the United States), smuggled south to the
cartels. And don’t forget that MS 13 is a gang that began in the United States,
spread their toxins through US prisons, moved south and established their
criminal hold on El Salvador. It’s a story that has been repeated too many
times south of our border.
So,
do we need that wall? Aren’t we getting our money’s worth? Are those serious
questions?
I’m Peter Dekom, and if you strongly
object to Donald Trump’s style and personality, that’s nothing compared to the
longer-term substantive damage he has done to this nation.
No comments:
Post a Comment