Then God blessed them, and God said to them,
“Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it;
have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the
air,
and over every living thing that moves on the earth.” Genesis – 1:28
To many evangelicals, God’s biblical pledge after the Great
Flood not to wreak global havoc was a carte blanche that took the lid off of
any restrictions against pouring greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere,
enabling those to deny the possibility of a massive disaster to humanity from
climate change. But was that sanctified promise about God’s protection of
whatever mankind might do to itself… as opposed to God-directed
catastrophic and unilateral imposition of punishing natural disaster? Likewise,
the above passage from Genesis is often cited (even by the Trump’s former head
of the Environmental Protection Agency) as justification for unbridled and open
exploitation of nature’s bounty, even as to non-renewable resources and species
extinction.
Clearly, the official Papal dictate on behalf of the Catholic
Church rejects the notion that God gave mankind permission to ravage the earth
without any responsibility for the consequences. In 2015, Pope Francis
released Laudato
Si (“Praised Be”), an encyclical on climate and
justice to “enter into dialogue with all people about our common home.” If
anything, the Pope very much took a position precisely opposite from the above
evangelical purported incantations. Indeed, even among evangelical communities
the world over, the American evangelical movement stands apart on environmental
issues; the American evangelical view is not globally endorsed.
Why is this relevant? Because so much in the way of
governmental policy these days is determined and justified to religious
references. From Hindu policies vis-a-vis Muslims to the belief by many,
particularly Christians and Muslims, that it is their mandate to convert the
world to their faith. Wars are started. People are persecuted. Freedoms
crushed. Environments are trashed. All in the name of God. Can this truly be
the dictate of a benevolent power for good? Personally, I obviously think not.
Once more, a little story – not so little to those
immediately impacted, from human to animal – rises to make the point that
American policy is being determined and justified by a religious minority with
fierce and politically essential support for Donald Trump and his designees. To
the detriment of our future, environment and the preservation of God’s
creations. Fish, bears, clean water and sustainable land vs. ripping apart the
earth in pursuit of copper and gold. Guess which side the Trump administration
supports. The latter expects to generate a cool $1 billion or more a year.
Money talks. Environment walks. Jobs and wealth trump respect for God’s
creations.
There are big environmental battles everywhere, but those
remaining vast untapped American natural resources are heavily concentrated in
Alaska… as are some of this nation’s most vulnerable ecosystems and species.
Alaska’s Katmai National Park borders the largest unmined
deposits of gold and copper in the world. There’s a company ready to exploit
those valuable metals with the full support of the Trump administration: “Pebble
Limited Partnership, a subsidiary of a Canadian company that aims to dig Pebble
Mine, an open pit the size of 460 football fields and deeper than One World
Trade Center is tall. To proponents, it’s a glittering prize that could yield
sales of more than $1 billion a year in an initial two decades of mining… Pebble
Partnership’s corporate parent, Northern Dynasty Minerals , originally
envisioned 78 years of mining, which would recover a little more than half of
the mother lode…. It could also, critics fear, bring about the destruction of
one of the world’s great fisheries…
“The Pebble Mine site lies 200 miles southwest of Anchorage.
One hundred miles farther southwest is Bristol Bay [pictured above], home to
the world’s largest run of wild sockeye salmon. Early each summer, hundreds of
32-foot commercial fishing boats surge into the bay, charging into
state-designated territories like riders in the Oklahoma Land Rush. The fishery
generates 14,000 jobs and $1.5 billion a year.
“Captains and crews come from around the world to reel in as
many tons of sockeye as they can during the lucrative two-month season.
Regional tribal leader Robin Samuelsen Jr. worked the bay last summer for his
54th season, his four grandsons reeling in wildly wriggling fish… ‘We have a
gold mine,’ he said. ‘It’s in salmon.’
“Alaska has long been known for grand ventures and great
risks. It’s also known for the richness of its natural resources, including
gold, copper — and salmon… In the case of the Pebble Mine, the question is: Can
they coexist?...
“In hopes of getting the initial phase past the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers for permitting under the Clean Water Act, the company scaled
down its project to a 20-year mine that would still be colossal, with waste
piles and other facilities occupying a site more than half the size of
Manhattan… Northern Dynasty’s plan leaves little margin for error.
“The development would destroy more than 3,400 acres of
wetlands and 81 miles of streams. It would straddle Upper Talarik Creek and the
Koktuli River, Bristol Bay tributaries known nationally for trophy trout
fishing and salmon spawning… Mineralized rock would be blasted in the pit,
crushed, ground into sand, floated and concentrated, producing 180,000 tons of
material a day. The challenge facing the company, in a place that averages more
than 50 inches of rain a year, is how to ensure that tainted water will never
reach Bristol Bay, which contains more than half of the North Pacific’s sockeye
salmon.
“Northern Dynasty would submerge particularly hazardous mine
tailings, piled across more than 1,000 acres, in water to prevent acid
generation. This waste would be contained in liners behind earthen dams and
ultimately dumped back into Pebble’s open pit after mining ended.
“Less hazardous bulk tailings, heaped across 2,800 acres,
would be held back by massive embankments designed to channel seepage into a
treatment system. In all, these tailings dams, some as high as 40 stories,
would extend more than 10 miles.
“Company representatives say the bulk waste would have the
consistency of inert sand. They say their latest plan would move most
operations out of Upper Talarik Creek to reduce risks. But mine opponents say
subterranean water systems are interconnected, and federal scientists say the
latest groundwater models are inadequate.
“The company plans to prevent contamination by treating as
much as 13,000 gallons of discharge a minute on average from ore processing,
tailings seepage and pit drainage, funneling it into the Koktuli River. The
amount, which dwarfs quantities handled by other U.S. hard-rock mines, would
increase to 22,000 gallons of water a minute after the mine closed. It would
level out at 5,000 gallons a minute thereafter — perpetually, every day of the
year, through storms, power outages and earthquakes.
“In Bristol Bay, commercial, sport and subsistence fishermen
worry about the dams, fearing they could breach or water treatment could fail.
If so, contaminants in Upper Talarik Creek could spew into Iliamna Lake,
Alaska’s biggest, and from there down the Kvichak River into the bay. Or toxins
could enter the north and south forks of the Koktuli, flowing into the bay
through two more rivers also legendary for salmon spawning.
“And that isn’t the only concern… Northern Dynasty proposes a
188-mile natural-gas pipeline across Cook Inlet to supply a power plant that
could light up a city the size of Gary, Ind. An icebreaking ferry would carry
ore 18 miles across Iliamna Lake, connecting to a haul road built through bear
migration territory, and from there to a proposed seaport…
“No one has studied Pebble Mine more thoroughly than
scientists at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, whose Seattle branch
spent three years examining the issue and concluded in 2014 that the mine could
cause ‘unacceptable adverse effects.’… Chris Hladick, EPA regional
administrator in Seattle, sent a 100-page critique to the corps on July 1,
saying the draft probably underestimated the potential harm to water quality
and fish. He warned that mine waste could discharge far more water than
predicted, affecting a larger area, and suggested lining the bulk tailings to
avoid contaminating groundwater.
“But a month later, after Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy lobbied
Trump, Hladick followed instructions from EPA headquarters and withdrew the
agency’s long-standing option to veto Pebble. The environmental organization
Earthworks has sent the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission evidence of
potential insider trading ahead of the agency’s reversal, which sent Northern
Dynasty’s shares soaring… In Bristol Bay, the EPA’s turnaround stung. Fishermen
knew Hladick as a former city manager of Dillingham, the bay’s commercial
fishing hub. He’s no longer welcome on many of their boats.
“Opposition to the mine has united players often at odds,
including Alaska Native communities and corporations, conservationists, sport
fishermen and hunters. Several organizations sued the EPA this month calling
for a reversal. On Wednesday, U.S. House Democrats opposing the mine argued
with Republicans during a committee hearing on Capitol Hill.” Richard Read and
Carolyn Cole writing for the October 27th Los Angeles Times.
Wouldn’t a massive open pit mine look so much better than the
above photograph? What could possibly go wrong? In one of the most seismically
active regions in the United States? Once gone, those species and that
ecosystem might take decades to reestablish… if ever. The copper and gold
aren’t going anywhere.
I’m
Peter Dekom, and nature does not seem to care how human beings interpret their
perceptions of God; she started with nothing… and can start over without
waiting for an election.
No comments:
Post a Comment