Friday, November 1, 2019
Irretrievable?
There will always be the greatest danger that the
decision will
be regulated more
by the comparative strength of parties,
than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.
Alexander Hamilton in the “The Federalist Papers.”
They are scared they cannot defeat us at the ballot box.
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif.
The House vote to approve the impeachment
inquiry broke down along party lines as expected. All Democrats. No
Republicans. Two Democrats – Collin Peterson from Minnesota and Jeff Van Drew
of New Jersey, both from districts that supported Trump in 2016 – voted against
the inquiry. That tiny defection drew some Republicans to claim disunity among
their opposition. One Democrat, Donald McEachin from Virginia, and three
Republicans, Jody Hice of Georgia, John Rose of Tennessee and William Timmons
of South Carolina, abstained.
The Democrats have pinned their hopes on the
expected result of public testimony of those with firsthand knowledge of the
President’s purported “quid pro quo” – trading American security to counter
Russian ambitions in Ukraine and against the West in exchange for political
ammunition to be used by Donald Trump in the upcoming 2020 elections. Perhaps,
the Dems reason, if Americans actually heard firsthand what happened, some
Republicans will break rank… and pull a miraculous vote in the GOP-controlled
(Mitch McConnell-controlled?) Senate to oust Trump. Or at least so poison the
President’s credibility that he will either resign (a la Nixon) or be
landslided out of office in the election.
Republicans have a pile of power no matter the
vote. That ultra-loyal base seems unwaivable in support of Donald Trump, some
bellowing that if Trump goes, they will take up arms in support of his reign. Republicans
need that base to win elections. With nothing material making its way through
Congress as each side digs in, since appropriations bills must emanate from the
Democratic-controlled House, Republicans can argue that the wasted effort to
remove Trump is both an attempt to usurp the will of the people from the 2016
election and a complete abrogation of the Dems duty to do the people’s
business, without meaningless distraction, and pass needed legislation on
myriad issues. That resonates with some independents.
Those Republicans in more moderate states can
even eschew the “witch hunt” mantra and opt for higher moral ground. The
President, they can say, may have acted improperly – in a manner that they
personally find morally objectionable – but his offenses did not rise to the
level of impeachment, and with an election so close, they would prefer that the
issue be decided directly by the people. No doubt, this is high stakes poker.
The more the Democrats move to the left, the easier the GOP’s case will be to
the disenchanted unaffiliated and swing-deciding independents and older, blue
dog Democrats.
Republicans are praying for leftist Elizabeth
Warren or Bernie Sanders as these two office-seekers have, at least for now,
usurped more moderate candidates’ standing in the polls. Republicans believe
that even if either of these candidates wins the presidency, he or she will be
unable to implement their agenda through Congress and leave the same bitter partisan
taste with American voters that has typified the Trump years. There are no
winners in the longer term.
Younger and more college educated Americans
are aghast at both parties. Climate change and artificial intelligence terrify
them. The rise of autocrats with US support disgusts them. The surge in income
inequality and the accelerating cost of living, the fact that the jobs they can
get do not remotely begin to cover student loans and housing, hurts them. Both
political parties seem anachronistic and out of touch. Government is slow,
prodding and unable to accomplish the obvious. Religiosity has a greater impact
on policy than fact. They’re the ones who have experienced the “active shooter”
drills in school.
The Republicans, even if Trump retains the presidency,
will be tainted for the foreseeable future as the party that suborned an
obvious corrupt and selfish president. The God party that shoveled money and
privilege to the wealthy. The party that voted to support tax cuts and against
desperately needed reforms. It is increasingly harder to be young and a
Trump-Republican outside of rural value states; the United States is now a
nation of cities, a seminal change in day-to-day core values and life
requirements. The Dems will be tainted with their inability to pass all the
lovely programs they promise through the cumbersome political process, an
impractical party that just cannot get out of its own way. Disunified,
particularly when compared to the GOP, by too many factions with mutually
exclusive goals. The Bickersons, if you will.
Between the political divide, people don’t
even talk to each other. Families and marriages actually break apart over
political differences. “Compromise” has left the building. Hope for a bright
future and upward mobility stare at a brick wall. Natural disasters, most
linked to climate change, have accelerated in intensity and frequency. The
American educational system is both expensive and decreasingly globally
competitive. Our infrastructure is a sad joke. Millions of Americans face
medical bankruptcy or inadequate medical care.
The nation is watching a demographic bulge of
older people who will increase pressures for support from the younger segments
of our nation. Our political system is failing at every level, and the young
know that they will be saddled with the consequences of this inane political
legacy, the massive deficits that they will have to repay.
I’m
Peter Dekom, and I am particularly saddened at the lack of viable political
candidates who have any notion on how to bring this nation back into a working
togetherness, one that tolerates differences but finds practical solutions to
keep the republic on track.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment