Showing posts with label dow. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dow. Show all posts

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Who’s the Fall Guy?



There are lots of folks who believe that the Dow is crashing because the financial world didn’t get the tax-cutting, deregulating Republican that they are supposed to have favored. I don’t think so. Both Barack Obama and John McCain supported tax cuts (in different ways), both decried lack of governmental oversight in the financial markets and both understood the need to absorb the pain while restructuring for a sound recovery. Strangely, I do not think that the election results had much to do with the Dow fall.

Instead, November 5-7 happened to be the precise days that a lot of financial information was reported; the “numbers” are coming out – they’re not Republican numbers or Democratic numbers, they are American numbers now. And here what Wall Street has been looking at in the last few days. How do you think you’d react looking at all this new information?

1. The U.S. Department of Labor just announced the highest unemployment rate in a quarter of a century. 3.84 million Americans are reported now unemployed and receiving unemployment benefits. Late October showed an increase of 122,000 in people who are continuing to receive unemployment benefits – the worst number since 1983.

2. The non-partisan Government Accountability Office (GAO) just advised President-Elect Obama to consider a top-down redo of the governmental oversight structure of the financial markets, which has been assembled and patched over decades in a piecemeal debacle of missing pieces, special interest concessions and failed vision. The GAO’s notice stated: “The current crisis facing the nation's financial markets dramatically illustrates the ineffectiveness of the regulatory system in overseeing the increasing complexity of U.S. markets, institutions, and products that have rapidly evolved over the last 30 years." It is clear that there is a litany of failure: the negative impact of the repeal of the once-required separation of traditional commercial banking from trading/investment banking (the partial repeal of Glass Steagall in 1999), to an unregulated derivatives market, to under-regulation of private equity and hedge funds, failure to address over-borrowing (with insufficient equity) at every level from homeowners to corporations, to a failure to impose meaningful standards on the credit rating organizations.

3. Retail sales in October have sunk to a low according to the ICSC-Goldman Sachs index, the weakest October performance since at least 1969 when the index began.

4. Worker productivity (the amount an employee produces for every hour on the job) slowed down by 3.6 percent.

5. Corporate earnings reports (for the last quarter, and the projections for the next quarter) have been pouring out, and the results are dismal.

6. The economy contracted at a 0.3 percent pace in the third quarter, which ended in September.

7. Foreclosures continue unabated and housing prices continue to fall. Bottom is still a ways away.

8. Overseas, the Bank of England just took an axe to its benchmark interest rate by 1.5 points, cutting it to 3 percent. This means the dollar strengthens but our exports drop.

I’m Peter Dekom, and I live here too.

Saturday, October 25, 2008

Bottom’s Up!



Banks won't really lend until they think we've hit “bottom.” They're hoarding cash to cover their bottoms. What is “bottom” and why does it matter? Are we looking at the Dow? Interest rates? Jobs? What? Well, let’s start with a basic proposition: banks don't often lend (or lend much) against assets that are depreciating in value, where money is scarce or where the borrower is unlikely to be able to pay the debt on time and on schedule.

Grassroots lenders don't have the money right now anyway (liquidity – money is still stuck way up in the system, per my earlier blogs), most people are watching their net worth fall (stocks and real estate), incomes are falling (so unless you have a big cushion, well – banks like cushions a lot), people are losing their jobs (unemployment), businesses are losing customer/clients or dropping sales and factory orders are down (gross domestic product – GDP), unsold inventory is up, houses are falling in value, etc. Even stuff we assume will hold value – like gold and oil – is dropping because there are fewer buyers and the buyers that exist cannot afford to pay what they did before (because they aren't doing as well). Negative growth and high unemployment are hallmarks of a recession.

The dollar is holding against most other currencies because, for example, folks are even more worried about the emerging markets – and the Euro has less stability than you might think because the Euro-based economies of European countries like Iceland, Hungary, Ukraine and Belarus have been hit much worse than the U.S. – they're looking for bailouts from the International Monetary Fund.

We are, politely, “de-leveraging,” a word that means getting rid of excess debt. We can get there by filing for bankruptcy (the Lehman Bros. debacle), renegotiating existing loans (by force – if the government will act, or by choice – if you know what you are doing), paying off debt (sometimes by selling assets – what some tycoons had to do to pay off their “margin calls” – loans they took to fatten up on juicy stocks that eventually gave them indigestion), getting “bailed out” by someone, merging with a solvent player and most certainly by not borrowing (often because we can't anyway). Credit card debt is a hidden issue waiting in the wings, by the way.

So bottom is kind of “everything.” House prices have to stabilize, unemployment has to level off, the stock market has to stop falling through the floor (and get back to the “couple of points” up or down every day), and people need to borrow based on real values at market interest rates but there has to be money in the lending system. We're not at bottom now; experts see that as possibly as much as several months away. I sure hope not, and there is so much that the government can do (see prior blogs) to right the ship.

So in simple English, the financial institutions who might lend you some money probably won't start until the bottom is reached (or when they are sure what it will be), because you can only go up from there. Right now, a whole lot of folks are trying to figure out what the bottom is and when we will arrive there. Hope it’s soon!

I’m Peter Dekom, and I approve this message.