Pain without Gain
For those of you around during the 1973 Arab Oil Embargo – when Middle Eastern exports were reduced because of Western support for Israel (there was a failed attempt by several Arab nations to invade Israel in October of that year) – you may recall gas rationing and long lines at the service station, there was significant job loss and a horrible stock market. We saw economic shrinkage (across the board reductions in jobs, gross domestic product, the stock market, etc.) in all three of the major industrialized areas of the time: U.S./Canada, Europe and Japan. Although we didn’t have nearly the same levels of borrowing or the technological paradigm shifts that we are experiencing today (especially in telecommunications, energy issues, etc.), we still felt the residual economic pain all the way through 1975.
My wife reminds me of the single can of soup that comprised lunch for two adults and a child… how when “meat” was “occasionally” served, it always seemed to be some form of old ground beef combined with “other.” I remember the macaroni and cheese days myself (almost every day?)... and the lines at the pump. Fleeting images now, but there are memories; it was a lot worse for many Americans. 1973-1975. That is the last time that all three major developed economic regions experienced negative growth at the same time… until now. Despite the recent assurances of Candidate McCain to the contrary, the fundamentals of our economy are so desperately wounded that we’re forced to spend hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to merely try to stop the bleeding.
While the U.S. saw recessions in both the early 1980s and 1990s, nothing like the current global meltdown has occurred since 1975. But, for those of you who missed the early 1970s, it doesn’t hurt to recall what even those later, much more minor, slowdowns felt like. Real estate prices crashed, jobs vanished and the stock market fell. The “dot-com” collapse at the turn of the century is still in most folks’ recent memory, yet that was but a mere flesh wound compared to the gaping lesions in our present economy. Economists define a recession as a contraction of gross domestic product (GDP – the value of all goods and services produced) for two or more consecutive quarters. Evaluate the numbers however you like… Boy are we there!
The “contraction” numbers used in these calculations aren’t corrected for population growth (note, Japan is actually experiencing negative population growth) or for a fall in the value of the underlying asset values (especially net of borrowing), so perhaps the technical definition of a recession is a form of denial. After all, a reduction of 1% in the GDP, doesn’t help Nevada where 47.2% of all homes are worth less than their mortgages. Recession or not, suffering is suffering. Remember the past.
The OECD recently stated that gross domestic product for its 30 member countries, representing democracies with market economies, was likely to fall by 0.3 percent in 2009. Specifically, it predicted that U.S. economy would contract next year by 0.9 percent, Japan's by 0.1 percent and the European area by 0.5 percent. The pain is global, but take a good look at how much higher the U.S. number is when compared to the average. We’re the ones with the subprime mortgage crisis, the huge foreclosure rate, which differentiate our economy from that of most (but not all) of the rest of the world.
The lesson is that we will recover, but that a wound requires healing time, and when the wound is severe enough, rehabilitation and healing take much longer. I hope our leadership will eventually take note of how international solutions taken by other nations might not be the right fix for the U.S. where the contraction is greater than the average and where there is one overwhelmingly differentiating reality to our side of the meltdown – the housing market collapse. No credit. Fewer jobs. And no home. One more thing in Southern California right now: devastating fires with incalculable suffering and damage. The new American dream – our nightmare.
I’m Peter Dekom, and I approve this message.
2 comments:
Peter,
Living in NYC one sees the news and reads about areas badly hit. In some respects it is only now starting to hit NYC. But if you look a little more closely, the signs started in 07 and got progressively worse throughout 2008 - stores becoming vacant, subways not as crowded, restaurants closing, Downtown not buzzing like it used to, less traffic on the highways. If you were to take a walk on Broadway on the Upper West Side, there are vacant stores on virtually every block.
However much of a downer we have today, the truth is that the buzz has been gone since a day in September in 2001.
And the impact of the current financial crisis, while long in the making (added to other woes as you point out), I fear is only BEGINNING. Financial analysts may tell you about support levels and historical patterns and on and on. But it is not history repeating itself this time. Wer are a global economy with cross investment and interdependence. This time (again as you point out) it is not isolated by a region, or a sector or an industry, ITS IN CONCRETE - housing - and all the supporting and ancillary sectors i.e financial, auto, agriculture and food, textile and clothing to name a few. And for many, that house was, or was the promise of, their only major asset.
When we bought our home I could never understand how the banks discussed a mortgage with me at amounts that required paramedics to resuscitate me. And its no different with credit cards. Of course the dream was in reach for many. Not only did banks fund the dream, its a double wammy as America is one of the few countries that offers incentives for people to own homes by allowing the mortgage interest deduction. This results in many cases where ownership is actually cheaper than renting after the deductions! But in reality - one has to wake up from a dream. And we are waking up not to a recurring nightmare but to a nightmare that will leave indelible scars on many and for some, one that will never end.
The ponzi scheme of the sub-mortgage fiasco and CDO's has I fear forever changed us in ways that will not be repaired in our lifetime. We can support industries and credit through bailouts, but people who don't have jobs, can't repay loans and do not have cash to spend. And if consumption does not happen and companies are not growing, where will those who have been laid off find a place to make a living to put a roof over their heads, food on the table and clothes on the kids?
Many have lost their jobs. That is only the beginning. Exports can't drive us - the rest of the world is in many cases worse off than we are! Especially because we are not spending and thus not buying the goods that we import (that used to be made domestically).
So my learned friend, with the finance world crumbling in NY and all around us, I wonder where these educated wealthy people will go to support themselves and those that their consumption supports - and how will the migration and industry/sector shift impact us? Or are we about to see a deleveraging of America the will shrink the wealthy and drive more to live in a fiscally sound manner?
With the bailouts of the banks, comes the resultant squeeze on compensation - especially bonuses. While many investment banks had performance based bonuses that often were obscenely high, many of these banks had base salaries capped at amounts that paled in comparison e.g. $250,000. With the acceptance of the bailout, those bonuses are seemingly history. So one of two things is going to happen in the short term. 1. salaries will become obscenely high with small bonuses. or 2. for an extended period more rational numbers will be in play and the financial world will never be the same. And in the long term? When the market eventually stabilizes and rebounds and home values climb, people will once again sigh and do what the bankers expected them to do - Thank them for helping them live the American Dream and reward them with huge payments and stock.
Don't think so - not this time. And not for a long time.
Would love to have this conversation in person!
Best,
Gary
You'll love the comparison of failed GM CEO compensation with successful Toyota CEO compensation.
Post a Comment