“The main reason why coal sticks around is, we built it
already.”
Rohit
Chandra, Harvard PhD
It’s been three years since the Paris climate
accord was signed. And for the last two years the use of coal to power
electrical generators has declined. Welcome to 2018, when the dirtiest of all
fossil fuels, coal (and the lesser grades of coal are unbelievably vile
pollution sources), is experiencing a resurgence. There is no
commercially-viable process that can create “clean coal.” The process that
produces “clean coal” is nothing more than forcing massive emissions from
burning coal deep underground for future generations to figure out.
“Cheap, plentiful and the most
polluting of fossil fuels, coal remains the single largest source of energy to
generate electricity worldwide. This, even as renewables like solar and
wind power are rapidly becoming more affordable. Soon, coal could make no
financial sense for its backers.
“So, why is coal so hard to quit? …
Because coal is a powerful incumbent. It’s there by the millions of tons under
the ground. Powerful companies, backed by powerful governments, often in the
form of subsidies, are in a rush to grow their markets before it is too late.
Banks still profit from it. Big national electricity grids were designed for
it. Coal plants can be a surefire way for politicians to deliver cheap
electricity — and retain their own power. In some countries, it has been a
glistening source of graft.” New York Times, November 24th.
Other than the existence of
infrastructure and the fact that vast coal reserves all around the planet offer
the lease expensive fossil fuel available, coal-fired power remains at the top
of the list of sources of global greenhouse gasses. As demand for coal in the
West, even in the United States where coal is lumbering under a misplaced and
failed Trump-policy encouraging more usage, slackens, Asia seems unable to kick
the habit:
“Home to half the world’s population, Asia
accounts for three-fourths of global coal
consumption today. More important, it accounts
for more than three-fourths of coal plants that are either under construction
or in the planning stages — a whopping 1,200 of them, according to Urgewald, a German advocacy
group that tracks coal development. Heffa Schücking, who heads
Urgewald, called those plants ‘an assault on the Paris goals.'
“Indonesia is digging more coal. Vietnam is
clearing ground for new coal-fired power plants. Japan, reeling from 2011
nuclear plant disaster, has resurrected coal."
“The world’s juggernaut, though, is China. The
country consumes half the world’s coal. More than 4.3 million
Chinese are employed in the country’s coal mines. China has added 40
percent of the world’s coal capacity since 2002, a huge increase for just
16 years. ‘I had to do the calculation three times,’ said Carlos Fernández
Alvarez, a senior energy analyst at the International Energy Agency. ‘I thought
it was wrong. It’s crazy.’
“Spurred by public outcry over air pollution,
China is now also the world leader in solar and wind power installation, and
its central government has tried to slow down coal plant construction. But an
analysis by Coal Swarm, a U.S.-based team of researchers
that advocates for coal alternatives, concluded
that new plants continue to be built, and other proposed projects have simply
been delayed rather than stopped. Chinese coal consumption grew in 2017, though
at a far slower pace than before, and is on track to grow again in 2018, after
declining in previous years.
“China’s coal industry is now
scrambling to find new markets, from Kenya to Pakistan. Chinese companies
are building coal plants in 17 countries, according to Urgewald. Its regional
rival, Japan, is in the game too: nearly 60 percent of planned coal projects
developed by Japanese companies are outside the country, mostly financed by
Japanese banks.” NY Times.
As Donald Trump’s efforts to ramp up more coal
production to fire more coal-fired electrical power generation have rather
dramatically failed, much of the rest of the world is making the longer-term
global warming disaster scenario so much worse. A November 23rd
13-federal agency report to Congress warns of drought, flooding, fires, loss of
coastal land, and increased storm intensity… the kind of stuff Trump likes to
ignore.
But as the hard cost of rebuilding after the accelerating
rate of climate-change-driven disasters – costs that sit will into the
trillions of dollars – merge with that report’s suggestion that our economy
should be expected to contract by 10% by the next century, you’d think a
president who worries about our economy and business advantage just might take
notice. But since his cronies would have to change their ways in dramatic
fashion ($$$), it’s easier to shrug shoulders or simply deny that there is a
problem.
We’re rapidly running out of time. As bad as
the disaster facing the United States might be, for most of the world, lacking
our economic power, the losses could kill millions of people and decimate the
quality of life, including health, for billions more. “Scientists
have repeatedly warned of its looming dangers… An October report from the United Nations’ scientific panel on global warming found that avoiding the worst
devastation would require a radical transformation of the world economy in
just a few years… Central to that transformation: Getting out of coal, and
fast.” NY Times. What humanity is really doing fast… is going in exactly the
wrong direction.
I’m Peter Dekom, and the degree of narrow-minded
environmental selfishness is on the brink of killing vastly more people than
all the great historical plagues combined while rendering significant tracts of
earth uninhabitable or agriculturally barren.
This is an interesting point of view on coal. We need to thinking more about it and about our world and economy.
ReplyDelete