Monday, June 3, 2019
Bug to the Future
You may remember your doctor’s
admonition when he or she placed you on a trace of antibiotics: “No matter
what, finish the entire prescription; don’t stop until all the pills are gone.”
If bacteria were able to express joy, nothing makes a toxic bacteria’s family
happier than humans and animals taking only a partial on their antibiotic
prescription. It helps that family of bacteria develop and immunity to that
particular form of antibiotic “fast and furious.” And there are so many new
“superbugs” today – bacteria that have no known effective antibiotic treatment.
Lots of us believe that bacteria evolve immunity to antibiotics through a
hit or miss Darwinian process of natural selection. Wait until there is a
mutation, and that mutation slowly replaces those members of the species not so
well equipped to deal with whatever nature has changed in their environment.
Gills to lungs, if you will. Not exactly.
For those super-scientifically
inclined, there’s a disturbing study reported in the May 24th
Science magazine with this cryptic title: Role of
AcrAB-TolC multidrug efflux pump in drug-resistance acquisition by plasmid
transfer. Hey,
doesn’t that title just say it all? Maybe the above pictures of the efflux pump
bacterial structure help? OK, not so much, but the results of that research
might be just as troubling to humanity as climate change. We’ve had a hate-hate
relationship with bacteria throughout our existence:
“For most of human history, bacteria
have had their way with us. Though some of them are helpful, others cause
dangerous diseases like pneumonia, cholera and meningitis. The bacterium
Yersinia pestis wiped out roughly 20% of the world’s population in the mid-1300s
during the pandemic known as the Black Death.
“When scientists first developed
antibiotics in the early 1900s, humans enjoyed the upper hand — for a while.
Some of the drugs target the machinery that maintains a bacterium’s
all-important cell wall. Others rob bacteria of the proteins they need to carry
out essential functions or damage the DNA needed to reproduce… It took just a
few decades for the first drug-resistant strains to appear. Since then, the
invention of each new antibiotic invited a jeering reply.
“Doctors responded by prescribing
another antibiotic drug, and another. Then two drugs together. Then three. But
now the arsenal is all but depleted, and there are strains of Escherichia coli,
Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter and Enterococcus that have evolved to
overcome almost every medicine thrown at them.
“So scientists are racing to
understand superbugs’ tactics. Among the most urgent questions is this: How
does antibiotic resistance spread between bacteria cells, even — or especially
— in the presence of antibiotics that are designed to knock them back?
“Bacteria know better than to wait
around for a random mutation in their DNA that will protect them from
antibiotics. Those mutations will come but not often: For some drugs, only
about 1 in 10,000 bacteria will develop resistance that way. For other drugs,
only about 1 in a billion will do so. Either way, that’s not very efficient.”
Emily Baumgaertner writing for the May 25th Los Angeles Times.
“But not all
bacteria are bad. In fact, some bacteria are necessary for us to live, eat,
work and feel healthy. Helpful bacteria makes good use of itself in foods, in
your garbage can and in your digestive system. Although
bacteria generally have a bad reputation, more is being learned about good
bacteria and how it helps us every day.” LiveStrong.com. Some of us even take
bacterial supplements to aid digestion: probiotics. Scientists are also
experimenting with the use of genetically altered viruses to control bacteria
and even to convert bacteria to new and unexpected uses: like generating
electricity. But for those one-celled critters hell-bent on infecting us, it’s
a whole different story. And they hardly rely on random natural selection to build
resistance to antibiotics.
“The tiny bacteria that live inside
our guts have an ingenious way of withstanding the onslaught of antibiotics we
throw at them, according to a report published this week in the journal
Science. The two-part system allows bacterial cells to stay alive until another
bacterium can deliver a lifeline, packaged in a snippet of DNA.
“‘I’m afraid our findings are great
news for bacterial cells — not so good for us,’ said study leader Christian
Lesterlin, a researcher in the molecular microbiology and structural
biochemistry program at the University of Lyon in France… Lesterlin and his
colleagues already knew that superbugs could repel even our most modern
medicines. What they didn’t know was how the microbes managed to pull it off.
“These are amazing abilities they
have, to be able to adapt and survive in harsh environments with antibiotics,”
he said. ‘But the more we understand about it, the more we can do for human
health.’…
“Lesterlin’s team wanted to visualize
exactly how the exchange worked [the bacteria to bacteria transfer of
information]. They put a regular strain of Escherichia coli bacteria in one
petri dish and a strain that is resistant to the antibiotic tetracycline in
another dish. Then they saturated both plates with tetracycline and watched
closely.
“Logic suggested the bacteria cells
lacking the ability to resist the drug would die. Instead, they simply went to
sleep. After several hours, the researchers combined the contents of the two
dishes and used a technique called live-cell microscopy to watch in real time
as plasmids were transferred in just two minutes from tetracycline-resistant
bacteria cells to tetracycline-sensitive ones.
“Less than two hours later, the
plasmid produced a protein called TetA resistance factor, which makes bacteria
impervious to tetracycline. That was ‘shockingly counterintuitive,’ Lesterlin
said, because tetracycline blocks the production of proteins by binding to the
machinery required to make them.
“The next question was this: How
could bacteria get away with producing drug-resistance proteins right there in
the presence of a protein-inhibiting drug?... As the hosts on QVC might say,
one can never have too many accessories… That’s especially true for something
called the AcrAB-TolC multidrug efflux pump, which sits on the cell’s outer
membrane and ejects various toxic antibiotics that have invaded the cell’s
interior.
“Despite the pump’s fancy name, it’s
not sufficient to keep the cell thriving amid a surge of antibiotics. But it
buys vital time for the groggy cell to acquire a plasmid with an all-important
resistance gene… Now that scientists understand the mechanics of plasmid
transfers, they can try to create new treatments that attack the multidrug
efflux pumps that allow resistance to spread.
“‘Bacteria have multiple weapons —
you can’t just shut down one weapon and expect to succeed,’ said Shaun Yang,
assistant medical director of the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory at UCLA, who
was not involved in the research. ‘From a drug development perspective, that’s
significant.’
“For now, scientists remain locked in
a race that could mean life or death for all organisms involved.
Antibiotic-resistant bacteria already kill at least 23,000 people in the United
States a year, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — an
estimate that most experts consider conservative… The United Nations warns
that, without action, drug-resistant infections could kill 10 million people
annually by 2050. That’s a public health nightmare but hardly a surprise.” LA
Times. And bacteria are absolutely everywhere in our environment. We need some
of them… and get killed by others.
I’m Peter Dekom, and what you cannot see
sometimes can kill you; sometimes it is the little things that count!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment