Friday, February 5, 2016
Going to School on Fish
I just read how a
single Bluefin tuna recently fetched a hefty $104,700 price from a couple of
Japanese sushi restauranteurs. It was a stunning number, working out to
$370/pound, a record. But the real story is the rapid depletion of the Bluefin
tuna from our oceans… and if you look carefully enough, at the overall
reduction in sea creatures generally all over the world. In addition to NOAA’s
(the government’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s)
announcement that 2015 was the hottest year on record, beyond the polluted
“dead zones” surrounding so many coastal cities and the harsh reality of
overfishing using mass-harvesting technologies that make commercial fishing so
efficient, there is the impact of our proclivity to discard used plastics by
the ton into our waterways and oceans.
So when 39-year-old
Dame Ellen MacArthur addressed the late January assemblage of world leaders at
Davos, Switzerland, she stunned the audience with research from her foundation
showing how, by 2050, there will be more plastic waste in our oceans, by
weight, than fish. Who is this woman? “On 7 February 2005 she broke the world record
for the fastest solo circumnavigation of the globe, a feat which gained her
international renown… Following her retirement from professional sailing on 2
September 2010, MacArthur announced the launch of the Ellen MacArthur
Foundation, a charity that works with business and education to accelerate the
transition to a circular economy.” Wikipedia.
“According to [that]
new Ellen MacArthur Foundation report [The New Plastics Economy: Rethinking the
future of plastics] launched at the World Economic Forum on [January 19th], new
plastics will consume 20% of all oil production within 35 years, up from an
estimated 5% today… Plastics production has increased twentyfold since 1964,
reaching 311m tonnes in 2014, the report says. It is expected to double again in
the next 20 years and almost quadruple by 2050. Despite the growing demand,
just 5% of plastics are recycled effectively, while 40% end up in landfill and
a third in fragile ecosystems such as the world’s oceans.
“Much of the remainder
is burned, generating energy, but causing more fossil fuels to be consumed in
order to make new plastic bags, cups, tubs and consumer devices demanded by the
economy.” The Guardian (U.K.), January 19th.
“An overwhelming 95
percent of plastic packaging worth $80-120 billion (73-110 billion euros) a
year is lost to the economy after a single use, said a global study by a
foundation fronted by yachtswoman Ellen MacArthur, which promotes recycling in
the economy… The study, which drew on multiple sources, proposed setting up a
new system to slash the leaking of plastics into nature, especially the oceans,
and to find alternatives to crude oil and natural gas as the raw material of
plastic production.
“At least eight million
tonnes of plastics find their way into the ocean every year -- equal to one
garbage truckful every minute, said the report by the Ellen MacArthur
Foundation, which included analysis by the McKinsey Centre for Business and
Environment… Available research estimates that there are more than 150 million
tonnes of plastics in the ocean today.” Yahoo.com, January 19th.
With ocean eddies and
currents, we’ve noticed that a substantial portion of the garbage dumped into
our oceans has formed massive patches of trash sitting idly in massive
accumulations. The above map, prepared by NOAA, shows the location several of
those floating garbage dumps in the Pacific Ocean.
Dianna Parker from the
NOAA Marine Debris Program, on NOAA’s Website, notes: "The words 'garbage
patch' accurately describes what it is, because these are patches of ocean that
contain our garbage. But they're not areas where you can easily go through and
skim trash off the surface. First of all, because they are tiny micro plastics
that aren't easily removable from the ocean. But also just because of the size
of this area. We did some quick calculations that if you tried to clean up less
than one percent of the North Pacific Ocean it would take 67 ships one year to
clean up that portion. And the bottom line is that until we prevent debris from
entering the ocean at the source, it's just going to keep congregating in these
areas. We could go out and clean it all up and then still have the same problem
on our hands as long as there's debris entering the ocean."
This is our planet,
source of food, water and the stuff of our society. And our planet is a mess.
God isn’t coming down to fix it. Nature isn’t going to alter the laws of
physics, biology and chemistry to accommodate a twisted vision of the
environment where we get to prioritize industrial growth without regard to the
consequences. These are our choices, as a society right down to the individual
level. And so far, we’ve been making the wrong ones.
I’m
Peter Dekom, and we do have choice, choice as to our individual consumption
patterns and our political leaders; if we continue to make the wrong choices,
we can kiss our growth assumptions goodbye in a world that will soon be
consumed with dealing with a roiling series of mega-natural disasters.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment