“For
decades, we've faced the threat of future pandemics without knowing how many viruses
are lurking
in the environment, in wildlife, waiting to
emerge. Finally we have a breakthrough—there aren't millions of
unknown
virus, just a few hundred thousand, and given the technology we have it's
possible that
in
my lifetime, we'll know the identity of every unknown virus on the
planet”
Peter Daszak, PhD,
corresponding author and president of EcoHealth Alliance.
There are literally billions of
viruses, with mutations and new varieties emerging all the time. There has been
an assumption that that a killer pandemic, one that obliterates hundreds of
thousands or millions of people, comes only once every hundred years or so.
Think: Spanish Flu of 1918-20 and COVID-19 of 2019/20 to ?? But depending on
which experts you speak with, given the pollution, deforestation, starvation,
climate change and drain on expendable resources, on an optimistic basis, our
planet is currently home to double the number of people than is sustainable.
Thus, probabilities are that even after COVID-19 passes, nature is highly likely
to continue to cull the herd. And viruses are a highly effective tool to
accomplish that goal.
The harsh reality suggests that as
horrible as COVID-19 is, there are viruses building out there that are vastly
worse. Infectious agents that will kill 60% of those infected, for example. We
weren’t remotely prepared for the current pandemic, and under the mantra of reducing
the role of government in our society, the federal government recently
dismantled programs focused on preventing or containing such outbreaks, both
internally and in outbound efforts to enhance global cooperation. Viruses are
not contained by political rhetoric or budgetary constraints and in fact might
well benefit from such lackadaisical attitudes. There is a horrific toll to be
paid when politicians prefer mythology to hard science.
Well before the COVID-19 explosion, strides
were being made in identifying viruses (currently infecting non-human mammals) that
might someday threaten humanity, separating out those viruses that do not have
that potential. On September 3, 2013, the Mailman School of Public Health at
Columbia University published the initial results of this effort to narrow the
focus of viral research in an article – First Estimate of Total Viruses in
Mammals: “Scientists estimate that there is a minimum of 320,000
viruses in mammals awaiting discovery. Collecting evidence of these viruses, or
even a majority of them, they say, could provide information critical to early
detection and mitigation of disease outbreaks in humans. This undertaking would
cost approximately $6.3 billion, or $1.4 billion [closer to $7/$1.6 billion
today] if limited to 85% of total viral diversity—a fraction of the economic
impact of a major pandemic like SARS [which inflicted as estimated $16 billion
in damage].
“Close to 70% of emerging viral diseases such
as HIV/AIDS, West Nile, Ebola, SARS, and influenza, are zoonoses—infections of
animals that cross into humans. Yet until now, there has been no good estimate
of the actual number of viruses that exist in any wildlife species.” Without addressing
the loss of life or the suffering even of those who recover, the “Centre for Risk Studies at the
University of Cambridge Judge Business School determined that the potential
[global] toll could range between what it called an ‘optimistic loss’ of $3.3
trillion in case of rapid recovery, and $82 trillion in the event of an
economic depression.
“While lost value of $82
trillion is the worst case scenario, the centre’s consensus projection was a
loss of some $26.8 trillion, or 5.3%, of global GDP in the coming five years…
To put a figure on the potential impact to some of the leading global
economies, the following five-year loss projections added more context (All %’s
represent five-year GDP estimates):
*US: Best case: $550 billion (0.4% of GDP). Worst case: $19.9
trillion (13.6%)
*UK: Best case: $96 billion (0.46%). Worst case: $2.5 trillion (16.8%)
*China: Best case: $1 trillion (0.9%). Worst case: $19 trillion (16.5%)” Daily News (UK), May 21st(italics
added).
Viruses aren’t the only
contagion that threaten people. There also dangerous bacteria, fungi and
parasites. In recent years, we have seen the rise of antibiotic-resistant
bacteria, but the scariest trend is focused on the rise of new seemingly
incurable viruses. Coronaviruses are just one significant category of viruses
(just like there is another category of Ebola viruses). Is it possible to take
out one entire family of viruses with a single vaccine? Who knows?
The Donald Trump approach to
this pandemic, inconsistently shifting responsibility and blame on state
governments, putting in and then taking out federal involvement, cutting
support and excoriating scientists and medical expertise, is obviously is a
soup-to-nuts failed policy. The White House’s writing off the pandemic threat
early in the game, denying the problem, delaying the response, defunding
agencies necessary to find solutions, blaming China, positing false statistics
as well as clearly ineffective cures and failing to step up federal involvement
in procuring and distributing supplies are estimated to have cost well over
thirty thousand American lives (according to Columbia University), a number
likely to rise significantly under federal pressure to open the economy without
following most CDC guidelines to limit infection rates.
Effectively, this laissez-faire
prioritization of totally reopening the economy, until a vaccine is clearly in
wide deployment (which is unlikely in the near term), is reliance on achieving
so-called herd immunity. The required exposure – which will explode infection
and mortality rates way beyond anything we have experienced to date – to the
disease is at least 60% of the population. We still hovering below 20%. To
understand exactly what herd immunity requirements are, please refer to my June
13th Are We Just Going to Learn to Live with
Massive Death Tolls? blog.
So many of us believe that once we
get past this horrific pandemic, we will be just fine for the foreseeable
future. No SARS. No MERS. No Ebola. They never happened? The only reality of
which we can be absolutely certain: there will be more epidemics, more
pandemics… and we will not have to wait a century for the next. To exacerbate
the risk, climate change is causing the migration of animals (including disease
carrying insects) and germs to climates that reflect the environments and
temperatures they are used to. New areas that have no experience with those
species or any built-up immunities to the migrating contagions. In the
meantime, the US COVID-19 infection and mortality rates are rising again.
I’m
Peter Dekom, and unless we unite as a nation and seriously increase federal
funding towards pandemic research, prevention, preparation and cure, the next
pandemic-resulting loss of life and economic damage could dwarf what we have
experienced and will experience from COVID-19.
No comments:
Post a Comment