Sunday, June 30, 2013

Wicked-Pedia

Wikipedia is that vast, relatively open-sourced reference book in the clouds. It is edited and reedited by sanctioned experts, who often disagree on the “facts.” “Brewing beneath the surface of every popular Wikipedia page is a minor war. Wikipedians bicker with each other in hidden ‘Talk’ pages about word choice and bias and, if a debate gets particularly contentious, one editor may edit over another editor's work.” Huffington Post, June 1st.
To examine the cultural priorities among controversial topics, “A group of researchers from Hungary, the UK and the U.S. determined the ‘controversiality’ of a Wikipedia page ‘by focusing on ‘reverts,’ i.e. when an editor undoes another editor’s edit completely and brings it to the version exactly the same as the version before the last version.’ Wikipedia's most controversial articles cover most of the subjects that engender controversy at the dinner table: religion, philosophy and politics.” Huffington Post.  The report is entitled The most controversial topics in Wikipedia: A multilingual and geographical analysis, and the scholars come from Oxford, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, the Central European University and Rutgers.
Across the board, the study reports that “The Islam and Muhammad pages are the most highly contested pages that are both contained the English, German, French Spanish language set and the Arabic, Persian, Hebrew languages set. Roughly 10% of the pages in each language set are also contested in another language set.” In terms of controversy, the authors say, “Politics-related articles exceed one quarter of the whole population and in addition to ‘geographical places’ and ‘Religion’ cover more than half of the most controversial articles. Culture-related articles including, literature, authors, printed and public media, movies and animations, entertainment and music industry, although ranked 8-10 according to the relative population. However putting all these categories together, it goes beyond 10% of the sample.”
A sample of the most controversial topics, by country, is presented in the graphic above. “The results are pretty fascinating. Americans are stuck in the past: the most controversial U.S. Wikipedia article is on George W. Bush. Czech Wikipedians are really interested in homosexuality; 3 of the top 10 most controversial articles deal with homosexuality. Unsurprisingly, Jesus causes controversy in most languages.” Huffington Post, June 1st.  In the end, Wikipedia is flushed with the biases and prejudices of the society around us, but it is indeed interesting how differently even Western cultures prioritize the controversies within their local purview.
I’m Peter Dekom, and understanding how many differences exist among and between cultures is often difficult for Americans living in a vast land with literally only two bordering countries.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Nishidani promoting hatred on Wikipedia for years.


PROMOTING MUFTI PROPAGANDA AGAINST JEWS WHILE HUMANIZING HIMMLER

On the page of Grand Mufti of Jerusalem

His edit in November 2015:

As he is so excited to find a "cherry" that can put Himmler in a nice light. He quotes Mufti's writing from the 1970s that Himmler "told" him in the early 1940s he was "shocked" to see Jews abused... But does not quote it the verbatim nor in context of how Sells writes it. His purported source.

The Mufti who called upon all Muslims to "Kill the Js wherever they are..this pleases Allah", and has escaped Nurnberg trial, decades later tried to rewrite details in his memoirs. Naturally, and he was bitter after six-day war too, as Sells writes. Though the hatred is still there, including believing J. are evil, (choosing to) believe in blood libel, etc.

Yet, even in choosing so enthusuadtaclly to quote this specific line, he intentionally omits the main fictional part, that Himmler was "shocked" (at all) seeing Jews abused. Instead, he edited it, to fit his intended goal to blame the Jews. The people who were all boxed together hungry and under strict orders of brutal Nazi guards.

++++++++


HELPING FARRAKHAN'S HATRED

Pushing for Khazar myth especially on the days it was used (again) for hatred

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/967431304

It was at a time of publicized Farrakhan's influenced "material" in hate in July 13, 2020. When the poison was in the aur. 2 days before Nick Cannon who pushed for it from Farrakhan, has finally retracted and apologized.

[Jerusalem Post › antisemitism
Nick Cannon walks back on video containing antisemitic.. statements ...Farrakhan has called Jews...
July 15, 2020
https://m.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/nick-cannon-walks-back-on-video-containing-antisemitic-statements-635098/amp]

[Nick Cannon Apologizes to Jewish Community for Hurtful Words
By Associated Press
July 16, 2020 01:17 PM
https://www.voanews.com/usa/race-america/nick-cannon-apologizes-jewish-community-hurtful-words]

++++++++

HOUTHIS

Upset, objects that the infamous anti Jewish Houthis are being cited for its use of own people as Human Shields on the human shields page.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Human_shield#New_Material

[Houthis' flag: officially called Ansar Allah), a political and religious movement and rebel group in Yemen, reads "Allah is Greater, Death to America, Death to Israel, Curse on the Jews, Victory to Islam https://www.latimes.com/world/middleeast/la-fg-death-to-america-death-to-israel-say-houthis-in-yemen-20150220-story.html . https://books.google.com/books?id=42SzDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT414 . https://m.jpost.com/middle-east/curse-the-jews-yemens-houthi-rebel-slogan-handed-out-at-university-569074/ ]


++++++++×

JEWS "VS"...

Nidhidani, edits, work on wikipedia come from seeing the world as non-Jews vs Jews. He also used the specific form exclusively used by Neo Nazis "goys" with the letter S at the end. (At least till his day of usafe).

His words in August 11 2020: "to win the minds and hearts of goys..." in the Human Shields page of wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/972379035