Wednesday, January 8, 2014
The Dark Knights
It
all started with the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision in 2010. That
ruling took the reins off campaign contributions from corporations, unions and
other organizations – as long as these funds were not controlled by the
candidates themselves – and allowed unlimited spending, some of it effectively
anonymous (under current law). Next related issue on the court’s 2014 agenda is
another case, McCutcheon vs. Federal Commission, which will decide whether
aggregate campaign, committee and party contribution limits are constitutional.
Money
flowed into the breach in the 2012 elections, but the most interesting aspect
of these funds was the potential of anonymity. “Spending by nonprofit groups
not disclosing their donors surged following the Supreme Court's 2010 Citizens
United decision that opened the door for unlimited corporate, union and,
ultimately, individual spending on independent political efforts. The [Internal
Revenue Code] 501(c)(4) nonprofit form became a preferred option for many as it
gave anonymity to wealthy but publicity-shy donors.
“To
maintain this donor anonymity, the nonprofits must spend more than half of
their time and budget each year on nonpolitical efforts in pursuit of their
declared tax-exempt purpose. Issue ads in which a candidate is named -- but the
public is not explicitly urged to vote for or against said candidate – are
often used by these groups to achieve their official purpose. The very same
candidates are often targeted with more direct electoral appeals closer to the
election.” Huffington Post, January 4th.
But
this segment of political financial support has accelerated in 2013 well-beyond
anyone’s expectations. 2013 wasn’t even a major election year! “[D]ata
collected by the Sunlight Foundation found that dark money groups have dropped
at least $24.6 million on issue ads naming specific candidates on television,
radio and online video since January 2013. That's seven times the $3.5 million
these groups spent on campaign activities reported to the Federal Election
Commission over the same period.” Huffington Post. Hmmmm, issues in
non-election years, and candidates during election years. Makes sense.
“The
issue advocacy totals reveal that dark money groups are already priming the
electorate ahead of the 2014 midterm elections. HuffPost's review also shows
that conservative and corporate interests continued to dominate overall dark
money spending in 2013, even as liberal dark money groups equaled the amount
spent by conservatives on campaign activity alone.
“Conservative
groups have already spent at least $15.8 million on issue ads to promote
Republican candidates and attack Democrats ahead of the November midterms.
Americans for Prosperity, the nonprofit founded and funded by the billionaire
Koch brothers, led all groups with at least $12.4 million spent on
candidate-specific ads opposing the implementation of Obamacare… Liberal dark
money groups, meanwhile, spent at least $3.3 million on issue advocacy with
nearly all of that spending coming from the League of Conservation Voters… One
signal that the intention of these ads is not simply to advance or block
legislation is that the majority of them since the beginning of 2013 have
mentioned incumbent lawmakers who are vulnerable in November.” Huffington Post.
Fresh
signals of what we are likely to see in the upcoming mid-term federal
elections. It must be nice to have enough money to influence the outcome of
elections, to have those running for office to accept your message and tone or
look like they are out of step with the obvious trends. In the old days, you
just had to bribe the elected official to get what you wanted if you were rich
and had no moral or legal worries about taking that action. There were risks,
but hey, the rewards were huge. Today, you can effectively deploy your cash to
buy elections quite legally… and you wonder why the rich get richer?!
“Loopholes and Low Tax Rates Я Us”!
I’m Peter Dekom,
and it’s actually getting embarrassing to brag about how effective the American
form of democracy is compared to ??????
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment