Tuesday, August 14, 2018
Almost as Needed as a Big Ostentatious Military Parade
Nobody
does adhocracy better than Donald Trump. Seat-of-the-pants policy-making is one
of the hallmarks of this thoroughly underprepared dictator-wannabe. If it
sounds good, if one of his “I need affirmation from the base” rallies responds
positively to yet another wasteful and inane proposal, it becomes rapidly set
in stone.
Examples:
A big powerful physical and mega-expensive wall in an era of highly
sophisticated digital tracking and detection systems. An immigration
deportation scheme that required detention housing we did not have, a
deportation work force we never needed and a system that would separate little
tiny children from their parents and threaten the immigration status of people
who really have never lived anywhere else. A massive and well-televised
military parade, generally part of an insecure nation’s message to its people
to stay in line, that most of Trump’s own forces see as both un-American (we
don’t have to flash our might to anyone; they already know) and wasteful (can
we deploy that money to Veteran’s Hospitals instead?).
Next
stupid idea: A new branch of the military, called the Space Force. Proposed in late June of this year, Trump stressed
that this would insure U.S. supremacy in outer space. Or would it be throwing
down the gauntlet to challenge nations to ramp up their counter-measures
immediately?
Internally,
the highest-ranking general staff in the military has been highly averse to
escalating the militarization of outer space, and any notion of weaponization
and military defense (the “Star Wars” defense shield) has been easily contained
within the Air Force, an expert branch of government with massive existing missile
and air power. While those currently in the military are mandated to follow the
policies of their Commander-in-Chief (er… that would be Donald Trump) and must
publicly support him, privately they simply cannot believe that they are going
to be forced to come up with implementing plans to present to Congress (the
only body that actually can authorize a military force).
It
is a tragic joke to them, particularly when the most present new “here and now”
threats are coming from cyberspace, an area that Trump is loath to address
because acknowledging the threat, as has every American intelligence agency
has, would be an admission that his electoral victory might actually be due in
significant part to Russian cyber-hacking and its campaign of disinformation.
So as necessary and immediate as that challenge to our democracy might be,
Donald prefers to weaponize the distant future of space instead. Not only is
that a terrible waste of money, not only does it send a terrible message to the
rest of the world on American intentions, but it invites every other world power
of note to do the same. Think of the billions of dollars that would be spent by
nations engaged in an unnecessary space race fomented by Donald John Trump!
A
very good summary of the unofficial reaction (the real reaction) from our own
military and knowledgeable civilian leaders comes from former Air Force
Secretary Deborah Lee James, who was interviewed (in June) in the August 10th
The Cipher Brief: “My first reaction [to the Trump
Space Force proposal]: I wondered what the President had maybe just seen
on TV that spurred him to do this. The announcement was a surprise to the
Pentagon. Secretary James Mattis did not know it was coming. The
Air Force did not know it was coming. As a matter of fact, the President
was speaking from prepared remarks for the Space Council that the inter-Agency
had looked at. Those remarks did not contain an announcement about Space
Force. So this was another adlib that took everybody by surprise and
clearly was not well thought through.
“As you probably know, there are one or two studies that
Secretary Mattis is charged with conducting. They’re in process, but
those studies were directed by Congress, so they have to be done. The
first one is due in the August timeframe, the second one is due at the end of
the year. The Center for Naval Analysis was hired to do one of those
studies which is meant to examine whether a Space Corps is a good idea and if
not, why not? If so, why? This would be the beginning of how
you might map it out. This was by order of the National Defense
Authorization Act of the House and Chairman Rogers (who was the proponent of
space corps).
“The second study was ordered to provide more specifics on how
you would pave the way and actually do it. So now that the president has
decreed it will happen, it will be interesting to see what this first report
says because it’s no secret that Secretary Mattis and the Air Force have been
against the idea – so now if they want to protect their jobs – they’re going to
have to reverse or appear to reverse, their position in order to back up what
the president said.”
Indeed, where experts who have retired from the federal
government are asked, there is almost a uniform revulsion to the notion of an
American military Space Force. Even as Vice President Mike Pence carries a
very-pro-Space Force message to the reaches of Trump’s base, there is a lot of
eye-rolling among those who really know what they are talking about. Like
former NASA astronaut, Scott Kelly, who feels that this militarization effort
could seriously jeopardize peaceful space exploration and multinational space
stations and cooperation:
“‘It's not clear to me what the purpose is
of this new branch of the military, which is going to be incredibly expensive,’
Kelly said Friday [8/3]. ‘And my big concern here is that, you know, space has
been a place for us to work in a peaceful manner. And, you know, changing that
with not any clear reason at this point is, like I said, kind of hard to
understand.’
“Kelly,
a U.S. Navy veteran, added that the envisioned force’s goals would likely be
redundant with space objectives already being worked toward by other military
branches… ‘Any time you add more bureaucracy to an already large bureaucracy,
it's going to cost a lot of money. I think the capability we're talking about
is something that probably already exists in the U.S. military, in the Air
Force, Navy, other armed services,’ he said. ‘I spent 25 years in the Navy, and
20 of it at NASA. And this is not something that we ever really heard was a
serious consideration over all that time.’” NBCNews.com, August 3rd.
You
mean that the President done thunk this one up, all by himself and announced it
without really running it by any of his most senior military or his civilian
experts? Without discussing the impact of such a statement on our relationship
with other nations with our Department of State? Yup! Wonder if Donald would
like a cool “Commander-in-Chief” military uniform with lots of ribbons and
medals… all the way down his legs too! Those North Koreans have got that look
down, along with ostentatious military parades!!!!
I’m Peter Dekom, and most clearly
coherent policy-making skills are no longer remotely prerequisites to becoming
President of the most powerful nation on earth.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment