Saturday, March 14, 2020

Tabulating During COVID-19 Makes No Census



The U.S. Census Bureau is carefully monitoring the coronavirus (COVID-19) situation and will follow the guidance of federal, state and local health authorities. We have also established the Census Bureau COVID-19 Internal Task Force to continuously monitor the situation and update our Pandemic Addendum to the Census Bureau Continuity of Operations (COOP) Plan. Our preparation and contingency planning centers on two key principles: The health and safety of our staff and the public is of the utmost consideration and importance. We must fulfill our constitutional obligation to deliver the 2020 Census counts to the President of the United States on schedule, and we must adhere to our core task of counting everyone once, only once, and in the right place.The key message right now for anyone with questions about how COVID-19 will affect the 2020 Census: It has never been easier to respond on your own, whether online, over the phone or by mail—all without having to meet a census taker.

From the US Census Bureau Website, March 11th                                                                                 

By constitutional mandate, every ten years, it’s time for an official governmental tally of exactly how many people are where… in the United States. Not how many citizens there are or folks with permanent residence status. People. Even visitors. It’s time for the US Census. The US Census Bureau (part of the US Department of Commerce) expects to have engaged a cadre of half a million census takers to work between May and July. But this just may be the peak time for the spread of COVID-19, and just what most folks do not want to see is a stranger at their door wanting some face time.

But the Census is critical for everything from the number of House seats given to each state to the allocation of federal aid and support. Planning and budgeting are a direct function of the statistics generated by that effort. In short, we really rely heavily on that. “State governments use the data to redraw legislative districts, while cities use it to determine where to build schools and police stations, which roads get repaired first, even whether to put in a crosswalk at an intersection. Businesses use the data to determine where to grow, and nonprofits use the figures to decide where they can be of the most help… An undercount would have a decade of repercussions for communities.” Los Angeles Times, March 13th.

Like many efforts from the Trump administration, there have been attempts to suppress the numbers of non-citizens, under false premises, who would be counted for various governmental purposes. Or even citizens unlikely to support a GOP tickets. Like the much-touted description of massive voter fraud, which is in fact virtually non-existent, to justify required government IDs to cast a ballot. Although stopped by a federal court because of the rather unsubtle background discussion showing an absolute attempt to discriminate, the Department of Commerce also sought to impose a Census question on US citizenship, a deterrent to already skeptical undocumented residents from even responding. Legally, everyone in the country is required by law to respond, but that has been fairly been ignored by enforcing authorities.

There are also real questions about how COVID-19 will impact the accuracy of the numbers. Those census takers have always been our insurance that even the suspicious and the reluctant would be polled. Even if folks do not mail in their forms, the human contact often forced compliance and maximized accuracy. But as you can see from the above post on the Census Bureau website, people are encouraged to provide their totally private and confidential (not everyone believes that) information in ways where no physical human contact is required.

So, let’s start with the telephone in a robocall, easily traceable universe. Folks are not likely to respond to someone calling them, and so the Census Bureau has to rely on folks calling in on designated phone lines to report Census data. Assuming they can read the information-request form they have been sent… and not tossed it in the trash. Most people are going to get a very short list of questions, but there are a significant number who, randomly, will get a rather long and detailed request for personal information. Where census takers are often required to push for a full and complete response. For a few, mailing in a response, postage prepaid, is an alternative… but if you tossed out or ignored the letter from the bureau, it is the census taker who has to press in person.

Hey, how about the ability to respond online? If you have a smart phone or a computer. But in communities of minorities, either because of age or income, what if they don’t have a computer or a smart phone. These are precisely the voters that the Trump administration hopes will fail to provide Census information. The individuals that are likely to lean left or demand more in the way of federally supported services. Particularly from states like California and New York. Blue. That blue states generally pay more in taxes than they receive in federal benefits (the only blue state where that is not true is Oregon), the opposite of a majority of red states, seems to get lost in translation.

Basically, census takers’ primary responsibility to collect information from individuals who do not voluntarily comply or who may be outside of their established mailing lists. Hand sanitizer and distancing protocols notwithstanding, it seems fairly obvious that census takers now have a major uphill battle just to attempt to count everyone. It is hard to stop this massive snowball from rolling down the mountain. The last time the Census was postponed – five months in 1920 by reason of the Spanish Flu – the Census process was not infused with all of these current political desires to manipulate the results.

But if we want a fair count, we just might need to do more than delay or extend the process. “‘If you are in an environment where public health professionals are telling you to be safe [and keep your distance], it’s just another challenge to recruiting people to do that good, important work,’ said Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.), who recently sent a letter with other U.S. senators asking the Census Bureau how it plans to conduct an accurate 2020 census during the outbreak and what it is doing to protect census workers…

“Smith is working with the agency to schedule a briefing for Congress about how coronavirus might affect its work as well as the ability to get an accurate count… Although the census is promoting online responses, ‘we also know there are a lot of people for whom that just is not going to work,’ Smith said. Many of the same people who don’t have home internet access are among the most difficult to count, she added.

“And the outbreak may continue to get worse during key periods of the count… ‘We don’t know where we are going to be in terms of our ability to test or where in the arc of this virus we’re going to be’ when it is time for census takers to visit homes, Smith said… She said she wants specific details about how the census plans to retain enough census takers to reach those who don’t respond online, by phone or by mail.

“Hoping to curtail the worst of the coronavirus outbreak, which the World Health Organization declared a pandemic Wednesday [3/11], public schools and universities have closed. Businesses are urging employees to work from home…

“In some areas, such as college campuses that have closed down or neighborhoods that have been quarantined, there might be a delay or disruption to the census, but the bureau has a reserve budget to allow it to move offices, hire extra workers or send extra mailings in case of an emergency, Cook said. No delays or changes have been made yet, though the bureau has created a task force to decide when it might be needed.

“‘We’ll adapt to make sure we’re getting the same population counted another way,’ [said Census Bureau spokesman Michael Cook]… He emphasized that college students should report living at their college address, even if the school has sent them home.” LA Times. What could possibly go wrong? I can see court challenges to the Census results from all kinds of groups/states likely to be undercounted by this process. Accuracy is the only justifiable mandate!

              I’m Peter Dekom, and it is difficult to trust an administration controlling the Census after they have overtly stated that they wish to contain and marginalize minorities as voters or as federal supplicants.


No comments: