Tuesday, March 31, 2020
Is Compassionate Capitalism Dead?
Did it ever really exist?
Under
US law, other than a proscription against violating statutes and bona fide
governmental regulations (“compliance”), corporate boards of directors have
only one fiduciary obligation: maximize shareholder values. Under the laws of
some European nations, shareholders are but one category of stakeholders to
which a corporate board has a statutory duty. Often these additional legally
empowered stakeholders include employees, unions, society and the community.
Corporate
boards in the US thus must justify their charitable efforts, not in terms of
sheer goodness, but in how such efforts improve their public or in-trade
perception, which in turn facilitates recruitment of skilled labor, increases
the desires of other businesses and customers to deal with them and adds to
their reputation of solidity and reliability. Those “desired responses” are
thus linked to the board’s sole corporate mandate: maximize shareholder values.
Where companies are controlled by individual mega-billionaires, the primary
shareholders, provided minority shareholders are not negatively prejudiced
(see, Cal Supreme Court: Jones vs. H.F. Ahmanson – 1969), pet charities
and causes are often prioritized… at some risk.
What
is equally at stake, as privileged classes are accorded greater power and
influence (see, US Supreme Court: Citizens United vs FEC – 2010), is
that amassed wealth allows those at the top of the income inequality ladder
(the worst spread in the entire developed world) to dictate power, influence
and, depending where they deploy their capital (including political
contributions), direct policy-making that used to be relegated to elected
representatives assumed to be operating in the interests of their
constituencies. In effect, what is considered political corruption in other nations,
using vast pools of capital even if not directly controlled by candidates
(wink, wink) to buy media, to make political contributions and effectively buy
polices favorable to those with the financing able to do so, has been legalized
in the United States. But by international standards, it is still viewed a
corruption. Regardless of the source –
for example, Soros on the left, Bloomberg in the middle and Adelson on the
right – money talks and free choice walks. We have become a plutocracy.
Strangely,
the populist upsurge for Donald Trump, ironically himself a member of the
monied elite, is as much a reflection of the failure of current governmental
realities – favoring “elites” – as anything else. Despite Trump’s current media
monopoly and surging approval ratings, he will be as much of a victim even as
he is currently seen as a “rally around the flag boys” champion in dealing with
this pandemic.
Younger
generations are watching and learning. Their fear that their elders were
saddling them with the legacy of complete and total disruption by reason of
ignoring climate change has temporarily refocused on the political distortions
and “mis-actions” of the federal government over COVID-19. These are the voters
of the future, if there is even a nation left in which to vote. And what they
see, particularly in urban concentrations, is that the current forms of our
“democracy” and the underlying elevation of naked “capitalism” are no longer
working.
The
rising generations were raised before the Cold War or the Red Scare that
dominated the post-WWI political scene until the 1989. They are not repelled by
words like “socialism” and “communism,” even as misinterpreted by conservative
politicians who tend to conflate social programs with socialism (hence,
Bernie Sanders use of “socialism” in his approach actually attracts the young);
they seem to feel a greater aversion to naked capitalism, at least the way it
has grown in the United States. Words that older generations spent years
fighting (Korea, Vietnam, etc.) no longer carry a negative connotation. They’ve
returned to the dictionary meanings without the brutal reality of the autocrats
who hid behind those concepts for total personal aggrandizement. Our younger
generations are watching distortions of the American form of government, as it
has devolved into a less than perfect, unequal representational form of
government, seemingly for the total personal aggrandizement of Donald John
Trump.
Those
who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat its mistakes. Thank you, George Santayana. And so it is
that most Americans believe that, as this pandemic eventually passes, we shall
return to what was before. History tells us that will not happen. The political
basics will change. Even if the United States survives, and even if this
happens past my lifetime, our current eroding and disappearing notion of
citizen equality, the beliefs that market-driven capitalism is why we are and
will be successful (as if one rule can last an eternity for all things and all
people, an obvious absurdity), are simply unsustainable. Unless we change our
views to the core, this will end… and end sooner than most realize. Fighting to
preserve it with a tweak or two may delay the inevitable, but this will not
stop what is coming. History is most instructive in this regard.
The
United States was already changing, experiencing upheavals, polarization that
we have not seen since the Civil War, facing new barriers that shake us to our
core. Asymmetrical warfare. Undermining the election process through
long-distance digital manipulation. Massive costs and disruption due to climate
change. Displacement of skilled workers by artificial intelligence and
implementing automation. Realignment of wealth and income tilting totally to
the top, and those elements using their wealth to usurp political power. The
first major pandemic since the Spanish Flu in 1918-20 (SARS, MERS, H1N1, Ebola,
etc. are not remotely as powerful).
What
we have today, a government for the rich, cannot deal with these changes. It
just does not work. For those who thought a dictator could never use the
elective process, at least in the United States (as did Hitler in Germany,
Putin in Russia, Erdogan in Turkey, etc.), to gain power, just watch Donald
Trump push the envelope to expand his powers knowing his GOP Senate majority
will protect him no matter what he does. Nature’s safety value just may be his
age and health, but once autocracy finds roots, unless it is instantly crushed,
it grows again like a persistent fungus.
Getting
back to the notion of “compassionate capitalism,” where rich folks simply do
what’s right because (??), let’s dissipate that mythology forever. I would like
to share the story in the March 30th Los Angeles Times that inspired
today’s blog. An excerpt: “For the last month [March], Army reservist Lt. Col.
Kamal Kalsi, an emergency room doctor in New York, has been scrambling to find
a way to quickly mass produce ventilators, equipment that could save the lives
of thousands of coronavirus victims nationwide.
“Two
weeks ago, he thought he’d found a company in Sacramento with the perfect
answer… But then, as he tells it, necessity took a back seat to business… The
firm Kalsi contacted wanted tens of millions of dollars before it would help
him, he said… Hearing that ‘tore me up a little,’ Kalsi said. ‘I understand.
It’s a capitalist system.’…
“Though
President Trump last week ordered General Motors to begin making ventilators
[as much motivated against arch-nemesis Mary Barra, GM’s CEO], he has been
hesitant to use the Defense Production Act, a Korean-War-era edict that allows
the commander in chief to commandeer resources, and to provide centralized
logistics and support that could help states obtain needed supplies.
“Instead,
the federal government has largely left states to procure supplies such as
masks and gowns themselves. The scramble has left those states, cities and even
hospitals competing against one another in a free-market response to the
pandemic.
“Adding
to the tension, state governors, including California Gov. Gavin Newsom, are
balancing those dire needs with the challenge of maintaining harmonious
relations with the federal government, including a president who values kind
words…
“The
ventilator Kalsi sees as the solution is the Go2Vent, made by Vortran Medical
in Sacramento and sold for about $100 each, though there is no proof it could
be the panacea that he envisions. Vortran’s founder and chief medical officer,
Dr. Gordon Wong, declined to comment, other than to say Friday he was close to
inking a mass production deal with a venture capital-backed manufacturer in
Chicago.” Use the Defense Production Act? Nothing from Trump on that one. How
about using state-empowered eminent domain to take the company?
“‘Corporate
profits should never be placed ahead of human life, and this is exactly why the
[Defense Production Act] should come in and force these guys to play ball,’
Kalsi said Friday [3/27]. ‘We’ve been working to push the governor of
California to push these guys…. Kalsi said he heard back that [California
Governor Gavin] Newsom’s office wasn’t sure it had the power to compel
anything. Legal experts say the issue is clear, noting that Newsom has declared
a state of emergency.
“‘When
there is a proclamation of a state of emergency, the governor of California is
vested with the power to commandeer public and private property,’ UC Berkeley
constitutional law expert Erwin Chemerinsky said in an email… If the governor
did so, he added, the state would have to pay ‘just compensation.’… Newsom’s
office did not immediately reply to a request for comment… The governor’s
approach to the pandemic has been one of putting the carrot before the stick.”
LA Times. Newsom walks the line between flaunting and further alienating Trump
and his obsession to protect capitalism at all costs (he still needs the
federal government)… and doing what should be done. How many must die from this
approach even as Newsom’s and New York’s Andrew Cuomo’s path is so far superior
to that of the President?
Vortran
Medical is just one example. There are tens of thousands more. There is no
morally or ethical basis to pretend what we have is the right system for the
current era… or to think that the government we have evolved truly services the
needs of the people it was elected to represent. History does not let us go
back to the way it was… no matter how much we think it can. Time for a do-over,
putting the Government of the people and by the people back into the hands of
those people.
I’m Peter Dekom, and if you think
I am angry, just realize that I am actually holding back!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment